Thank you for this. It is nice to hear from someone who does not believe in viruses yet doesn't want to tell people what to believe, insult them, their choices and demonize safe things, calling them poison.
I do believe in viruses and have no problem if someone believes different from me however the extreme backlash and barrage of logical…
Thank you for this. It is nice to hear from someone who does not believe in viruses yet doesn't want to tell people what to believe, insult them, their choices and demonize safe things, calling them poison.
I do believe in viruses and have no problem if someone believes different from me however the extreme backlash and barrage of logical fallacy arguments from NAV (Not A Virus) *who have no proof it isn't a virus* is exhausting and counterproductive, sewing division and at times, harming the movement to stop these sick globalists.
I've been away from substack for some time due to my son's health issues. Day one coming back, my first comment on Ana's page regarding spraying of polio vaccines, an NAV was relentless in their push for me to change my beliefs and everyone to dismiss me which feeds directly into the cabal's desire... for no one to be prosecuted for unleashing viruses onto us all, either through lab leak, GOF or vaccine contamination of cancer causing viruses, viruses that give people the disease they are meant to protect against.
I cannot even make a simple comment without being attacked by NAV. It is like an obsession to demand I change my beliefs, call me names, insinuate I am working for pharma because I don't agree. Meanwhile Yeadon actually worked for Pfizer.
I am personally not convinced by either camps NAV or virus camp. It is just NOT black and white. I find that both sides have valid views, great explanations, compelling theories and all kind of "factual" data but still none of them can provide full, in details, complete satisfactory answer for all questions. Believing in viruses, to me makes sense a lot as modern medical science after discovering existence of bacterium soon found out that they are still not being able to control or stop various diseases...so has to be something beyond bacterium, much smaller as bacterium can " malfunction", get " infected"...
I kind of see "viruses" as not alive or dead, special nanoparticles, simple mRNA treads, ancient codes that were left after the cellular evolution which at one stage reached dead end, evolutionary molecular micro "space" junk. Human body with weakened and lowered immunity allows that junk trojan horse to enter the healthy cell, then it starts interacting with cellular machinery and itakes foreign proteins. Human body goes haywire, overreacts as foreign proteins start to appear in large numbers. Level and intensity of symptoms+ infectiousness is directly proportional to the metabolic health of individual. And basically that's where I am at in my understandings on this mattter
Viruses could be RNA sequences, or proteins, or agents of some sort (synthetic or biological). I like the idea of nanoparticles or ancient codes. There's clearly a differentiation vs bacteria or parasites in some instances, but as you note, other times it's not so clear. It may be that some diseases have been wrongly attributed to one or the other.
It's also the case that similar clusters of symptoms can have multiple causes, but modern medicine likes to conflate things so they are designated to be a single disease and therefore there is a bigger pool of patients to treat. In fact, many diseases are really "syndromes" (a collection of symptoms). This is the case with many autoimmune conditions, psychiatric diagnoses, and probably flu-like illnesses too.
Viruses, shmiruses! Whatever, they injected us (one way or another - for the unjabbed, they got it in water, air (Chemtrails), 'shedding', in food) with if not viruses, with nano-tech, 'Spike Protein', mRNA and DNA, toxic 'adjuvants', lipid nanoparticles, and assorted contaminants.
THERE IS MISDIRECTED COMPASSION HERE. People who do not call other people out ...when they lie or spread ..Mis-information think they are being ..RIGHTIOUS. NO, they are only thinking of themselves.
There are reasonable, polite and respectful ways of calling people out, and then there's bullying, indoctrination, struggle sessions, re-education camps, name calling, and psychological torture.
I prefer having the chap around for a cup of tea and a friendly chat to see where we agree and where we disagree.
Thank you for this. It is nice to hear from someone who does not believe in viruses yet doesn't want to tell people what to believe, insult them, their choices and demonize safe things, calling them poison.
I do believe in viruses and have no problem if someone believes different from me however the extreme backlash and barrage of logical fallacy arguments from NAV (Not A Virus) *who have no proof it isn't a virus* is exhausting and counterproductive, sewing division and at times, harming the movement to stop these sick globalists.
I've been away from substack for some time due to my son's health issues. Day one coming back, my first comment on Ana's page regarding spraying of polio vaccines, an NAV was relentless in their push for me to change my beliefs and everyone to dismiss me which feeds directly into the cabal's desire... for no one to be prosecuted for unleashing viruses onto us all, either through lab leak, GOF or vaccine contamination of cancer causing viruses, viruses that give people the disease they are meant to protect against.
I cannot even make a simple comment without being attacked by NAV. It is like an obsession to demand I change my beliefs, call me names, insinuate I am working for pharma because I don't agree. Meanwhile Yeadon actually worked for Pfizer.
I am personally not convinced by either camps NAV or virus camp. It is just NOT black and white. I find that both sides have valid views, great explanations, compelling theories and all kind of "factual" data but still none of them can provide full, in details, complete satisfactory answer for all questions. Believing in viruses, to me makes sense a lot as modern medical science after discovering existence of bacterium soon found out that they are still not being able to control or stop various diseases...so has to be something beyond bacterium, much smaller as bacterium can " malfunction", get " infected"...
I kind of see "viruses" as not alive or dead, special nanoparticles, simple mRNA treads, ancient codes that were left after the cellular evolution which at one stage reached dead end, evolutionary molecular micro "space" junk. Human body with weakened and lowered immunity allows that junk trojan horse to enter the healthy cell, then it starts interacting with cellular machinery and itakes foreign proteins. Human body goes haywire, overreacts as foreign proteins start to appear in large numbers. Level and intensity of symptoms+ infectiousness is directly proportional to the metabolic health of individual. And basically that's where I am at in my understandings on this mattter
You've basically summed up where I'm at too.
Viruses could be RNA sequences, or proteins, or agents of some sort (synthetic or biological). I like the idea of nanoparticles or ancient codes. There's clearly a differentiation vs bacteria or parasites in some instances, but as you note, other times it's not so clear. It may be that some diseases have been wrongly attributed to one or the other.
It's also the case that similar clusters of symptoms can have multiple causes, but modern medicine likes to conflate things so they are designated to be a single disease and therefore there is a bigger pool of patients to treat. In fact, many diseases are really "syndromes" (a collection of symptoms). This is the case with many autoimmune conditions, psychiatric diagnoses, and probably flu-like illnesses too.
Viruses, shmiruses! Whatever, they injected us (one way or another - for the unjabbed, they got it in water, air (Chemtrails), 'shedding', in food) with if not viruses, with nano-tech, 'Spike Protein', mRNA and DNA, toxic 'adjuvants', lipid nanoparticles, and assorted contaminants.
THERE IS MISDIRECTED COMPASSION HERE. People who do not call other people out ...when they lie or spread ..Mis-information think they are being ..RIGHTIOUS. NO, they are only thinking of themselves.
You sound a bit like Kier Starmer there.
There are reasonable, polite and respectful ways of calling people out, and then there's bullying, indoctrination, struggle sessions, re-education camps, name calling, and psychological torture.
I prefer having the chap around for a cup of tea and a friendly chat to see where we agree and where we disagree.
Another NAV fanatic, I assume?