I am personally not convinced by either camps NAV or virus camp. It is just NOT black and white. I find that both sides have valid views, great explanations, compelling theories and all kind of "factual" data but still none of them can provide full, in details, complete satisfactory answer for all questions. Believing in viruses, to me m…
I am personally not convinced by either camps NAV or virus camp. It is just NOT black and white. I find that both sides have valid views, great explanations, compelling theories and all kind of "factual" data but still none of them can provide full, in details, complete satisfactory answer for all questions. Believing in viruses, to me makes sense a lot as modern medical science after discovering existence of bacterium soon found out that they are still not being able to control or stop various diseases...so has to be something beyond bacterium, much smaller as bacterium can " malfunction", get " infected"...
I kind of see "viruses" as not alive or dead, special nanoparticles, simple mRNA treads, ancient codes that were left after the cellular evolution which at one stage reached dead end, evolutionary molecular micro "space" junk. Human body with weakened and lowered immunity allows that junk trojan horse to enter the healthy cell, then it starts interacting with cellular machinery and itakes foreign proteins. Human body goes haywire, overreacts as foreign proteins start to appear in large numbers. Level and intensity of symptoms+ infectiousness is directly proportional to the metabolic health of individual. And basically that's where I am at in my understandings on this mattter
Viruses could be RNA sequences, or proteins, or agents of some sort (synthetic or biological). I like the idea of nanoparticles or ancient codes. There's clearly a differentiation vs bacteria or parasites in some instances, but as you note, other times it's not so clear. It may be that some diseases have been wrongly attributed to one or the other.
It's also the case that similar clusters of symptoms can have multiple causes, but modern medicine likes to conflate things so they are designated to be a single disease and therefore there is a bigger pool of patients to treat. In fact, many diseases are really "syndromes" (a collection of symptoms). This is the case with many autoimmune conditions, psychiatric diagnoses, and probably flu-like illnesses too.
I am personally not convinced by either camps NAV or virus camp. It is just NOT black and white. I find that both sides have valid views, great explanations, compelling theories and all kind of "factual" data but still none of them can provide full, in details, complete satisfactory answer for all questions. Believing in viruses, to me makes sense a lot as modern medical science after discovering existence of bacterium soon found out that they are still not being able to control or stop various diseases...so has to be something beyond bacterium, much smaller as bacterium can " malfunction", get " infected"...
I kind of see "viruses" as not alive or dead, special nanoparticles, simple mRNA treads, ancient codes that were left after the cellular evolution which at one stage reached dead end, evolutionary molecular micro "space" junk. Human body with weakened and lowered immunity allows that junk trojan horse to enter the healthy cell, then it starts interacting with cellular machinery and itakes foreign proteins. Human body goes haywire, overreacts as foreign proteins start to appear in large numbers. Level and intensity of symptoms+ infectiousness is directly proportional to the metabolic health of individual. And basically that's where I am at in my understandings on this mattter
You've basically summed up where I'm at too.
Viruses could be RNA sequences, or proteins, or agents of some sort (synthetic or biological). I like the idea of nanoparticles or ancient codes. There's clearly a differentiation vs bacteria or parasites in some instances, but as you note, other times it's not so clear. It may be that some diseases have been wrongly attributed to one or the other.
It's also the case that similar clusters of symptoms can have multiple causes, but modern medicine likes to conflate things so they are designated to be a single disease and therefore there is a bigger pool of patients to treat. In fact, many diseases are really "syndromes" (a collection of symptoms). This is the case with many autoimmune conditions, psychiatric diagnoses, and probably flu-like illnesses too.