Dr. Lawrie, I've heard you speak about (and also read from you) how you've not liked the center stage and how difficult the last few years have been for you in this way. I just want to affirm how much your honesty and determination mean to so many people! Your presence out in the world is such a blessing for us and if COVID has taught us anything, it is that there are heroes like you who may have flinched, but still took up the fight bravely and well. What a shining example to us all. Thank you, thank you.
with regard to holding people to account. Here is a sample letter of how people could have handled civic restriction policy in Canada: Letter to Town Councils from Citizens re: Project: Prove It!
We, the undersigned wo/men of (town name) require Council desist from participating in human rights violations being perpetrated under Health Orders and Mandates proclaimed by the Medical Health Officer of (province). See websites of the following organizations for evidence that refutes claims made by Provincial and Federal Health Services.
We require you either 1) immediately desist in following these Orders and Mandates or 2) you participate in the following initiative which provides a deadline date by which you cease to participate with the Orders and Mandates unless debate determines they are preferable to the protocols supported by the other debating parties. We strongly suggest you request other town councils participate.
*Black’s Law Dictionary: Mandate: (Also true of ‘Order’) “A written command given by a principal to an agent specifically a commission or contract by which one person, (the mandator) requests someone, (the mandatory) to perform some service gratuitously, the commission becoming effective when the mandatory agrees.” *It’s only mandatory if you agree to it. It’s an invitation in the guise of requirement.
Therefore, since participation to enforce mandates/orders is voluntary, failure to implement one of these two options permits citizens to hold Council Members personally accountable for human rights violations.
February 20, 2022 Urgent
To: (MHO, Minister of Health, premier).
Project: PROVE IT! Let the Scientists Speak.
We the undersigned agree to adhere to provincial co-vid restrictions and mandates upon receiving proof these policies are necessary.
the mRNA drugs labelled ‘vaccines’ do not meet the standards for protection required of vaccines.
they are causing a vast array of medical injuries including death
‘mandatory vaccines’ and the need for ‘vaccine passports’ cannot be substantiated due to the ineffectiveness and harm caused by the ‘vaccine products’.
the Interim Order to permit ‘vaccines’ without long-term trials was not necessary as other effective treatments have been found to be successful in other countries.
preventative and early onset treatment protocols provided by the aforementioned Health Organizations for the disease called Co-vid 19 are highly effective in reducing severe illness. This data was ignored by Health Agencies in favour of the exclusive promotion of an experimental vaccine product.
‘number of cases’ data based on the PCR test was an inappropriate tool to determine Public Health Protocols
asymptomatic transmission of the virus does not occur and therefore testing healthy people with an inaccurate tool caused unnecessary physical/psychological harm to millions of Albertans
medical devices known as ‘masks’ are harmful and less effective in reducing viral transmission and replication than preventative protocols supported by the organizations listed above.
We REQUIRE:
if you disagree with the scientific data provided by these organizations, you hold a Public Debate with representatives from at least two of the aforementioned organizations, to present your rebuttal re: the topics identified
2) all parties in the debate must provide their list of scientific references to all other participants a minimum of four days prior to the debate
these references be made available to the public by the time of the debate.
Further, we REQUIRE:
The Medical Health Officer state and provide a transcript of their Oath of Office.
The Medical Health Officer or other Provincial Authority provide evidence the implementation of pandemic protocol was by law or legality transferred from The Provincial Emergency Measures Department to the Medical Health Officer.
Due to the extreme widespread consequences of these mandates we require either:
an immediate end to all Mandates and Orders brought forth by the Medical Health Officer regarding the illness known as Co-vid 19 OR
the debate with the named organizations be conducted by March 5, 2022, otherwise we will consider all mandates and orders null and void.
We require a response by the Medical Health Officer within seven days.
Bascially, if we loved our neighbour as ourselves, there'd be no need for any laws at all. Love trumps the law every time.
BUT - you're never going to persuade people to love each other in that way, because, deep down, everyone looks out for himself and has been taught to do so.
What's needed is Something which kills that ugly selfishness at the root.
And that was effected by the death of God on the cross at Golgotha.
Completely agree. But if a society doesn't believe in the Creator, and that we are all created in the image of God, and are equal, they won't treat others in the right way. It all goes back to the basic belief in a real, personal Creator Who will call us all to account.
Breaking the censors—that’s the critical project of the age. Thank you for your service. Click the link for an advanced draft copy of my new book about what is going on, Cassandra’s Memo, COVID and the Global Psychopaths. I will distribute it free. https://pr.bookfunnel.com/jfbafaf All comments and critiques are appreciated. robertyoho.substack.com
ps - I'm gonna say something right off that might be off base, but I appreciate that your image is on the right side versus the left when you are talking with your guest. That is not how it often is done and that is not a coincidence and so I appreciate somebody's conscious choice to present the interview as such.
pss - off course I won't take this to an extreme, but I've listened to the beginning and I agree, now just to get a bit 3-dimensional for a moment, my initial ps sentiment above was based upon me watching an image of you and your guest on the screen. If there happened to be somebody watching from the other side, the what is to my right per my perspective, would be to their left (being they are looking from the opposite side). So, my point is that the concepts of "right" and "left" are really subjective. But, with that said, the concepts of folks caring about each other and working together as a group and a community - I think this concepts are built into our brains and I think many realize - tis time for a change. A change for the better.
You know it raises the question - who is asking the questions and who in answering? Sometimes the waters are muddy on this, but usually per some convention long ago agreed I reckon, where I reside the one asking the question is on the screen on the left.
In this instance, being this is Tess's place and she was the one hosting the interview, it seemed to be the opposite of convention and that simply is all I appreciated.
When it comes to ideas about ways to get together, I've been trying to share what I think and I appreciate others doing likewise, so I appreciate you and your efforts as well.
So, consideration is not requested, but if given tis appreciated and I think this mainly.
Dr. Lawrie, I've heard you speak about (and also read from you) how you've not liked the center stage and how difficult the last few years have been for you in this way. I just want to affirm how much your honesty and determination mean to so many people! Your presence out in the world is such a blessing for us and if COVID has taught us anything, it is that there are heroes like you who may have flinched, but still took up the fight bravely and well. What a shining example to us all. Thank you, thank you.
Beautifully said! I completely agree.
with regard to holding people to account. Here is a sample letter of how people could have handled civic restriction policy in Canada: Letter to Town Councils from Citizens re: Project: Prove It!
We, the undersigned wo/men of (town name) require Council desist from participating in human rights violations being perpetrated under Health Orders and Mandates proclaimed by the Medical Health Officer of (province). See websites of the following organizations for evidence that refutes claims made by Provincial and Federal Health Services.
We require you either 1) immediately desist in following these Orders and Mandates or 2) you participate in the following initiative which provides a deadline date by which you cease to participate with the Orders and Mandates unless debate determines they are preferable to the protocols supported by the other debating parties. We strongly suggest you request other town councils participate.
*Black’s Law Dictionary: Mandate: (Also true of ‘Order’) “A written command given by a principal to an agent specifically a commission or contract by which one person, (the mandator) requests someone, (the mandatory) to perform some service gratuitously, the commission becoming effective when the mandatory agrees.” *It’s only mandatory if you agree to it. It’s an invitation in the guise of requirement.
Therefore, since participation to enforce mandates/orders is voluntary, failure to implement one of these two options permits citizens to hold Council Members personally accountable for human rights violations.
February 20, 2022 Urgent
To: (MHO, Minister of Health, premier).
Project: PROVE IT! Let the Scientists Speak.
We the undersigned agree to adhere to provincial co-vid restrictions and mandates upon receiving proof these policies are necessary.
We find the scientific data provided on the websites of worldcouncilforhealth.org, canadiancovidcarealliance.org, canadianhealthalliance.org, pandemicalternative.org. provide adequate proof the Health Orders/Mandates from Alberta Health Services have generated enormous physical, psychological and financial harm to citizens and Canadian Society. Specifically:
the mRNA drugs labelled ‘vaccines’ do not meet the standards for protection required of vaccines.
they are causing a vast array of medical injuries including death
‘mandatory vaccines’ and the need for ‘vaccine passports’ cannot be substantiated due to the ineffectiveness and harm caused by the ‘vaccine products’.
the Interim Order to permit ‘vaccines’ without long-term trials was not necessary as other effective treatments have been found to be successful in other countries.
preventative and early onset treatment protocols provided by the aforementioned Health Organizations for the disease called Co-vid 19 are highly effective in reducing severe illness. This data was ignored by Health Agencies in favour of the exclusive promotion of an experimental vaccine product.
‘number of cases’ data based on the PCR test was an inappropriate tool to determine Public Health Protocols
asymptomatic transmission of the virus does not occur and therefore testing healthy people with an inaccurate tool caused unnecessary physical/psychological harm to millions of Albertans
medical devices known as ‘masks’ are harmful and less effective in reducing viral transmission and replication than preventative protocols supported by the organizations listed above.
We REQUIRE:
if you disagree with the scientific data provided by these organizations, you hold a Public Debate with representatives from at least two of the aforementioned organizations, to present your rebuttal re: the topics identified
2) all parties in the debate must provide their list of scientific references to all other participants a minimum of four days prior to the debate
these references be made available to the public by the time of the debate.
Further, we REQUIRE:
The Medical Health Officer state and provide a transcript of their Oath of Office.
The Medical Health Officer or other Provincial Authority provide evidence the implementation of pandemic protocol was by law or legality transferred from The Provincial Emergency Measures Department to the Medical Health Officer.
Due to the extreme widespread consequences of these mandates we require either:
an immediate end to all Mandates and Orders brought forth by the Medical Health Officer regarding the illness known as Co-vid 19 OR
the debate with the named organizations be conducted by March 5, 2022, otherwise we will consider all mandates and orders null and void.
We require a response by the Medical Health Officer within seven days.
(Printed names and signatures)
This! Thank you.
I can't help thinking of the analogy of Big Pharma's relentless campaign, and the Nazis' sales brochure: Triumph Of The Will...
Triumph des Willens is the title in German I see. It should be 'Triumph des Villains'!
Of course big pharma is essentially Germanic in nature and run by modern day Nazis.
Bascially, if we loved our neighbour as ourselves, there'd be no need for any laws at all. Love trumps the law every time.
BUT - you're never going to persuade people to love each other in that way, because, deep down, everyone looks out for himself and has been taught to do so.
What's needed is Something which kills that ugly selfishness at the root.
And that was effected by the death of God on the cross at Golgotha.
Trouble is - people don't believe it.
Very true
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/t-is-for-truth/
Personal responsibility, the lack of it is ruining people everywhere.
Completely agree. But if a society doesn't believe in the Creator, and that we are all created in the image of God, and are equal, they won't treat others in the right way. It all goes back to the basic belief in a real, personal Creator Who will call us all to account.
You are not what you have.
You are not what you do.
You are not what others say you are.
True to form, an excellent discussion; thank you Ruth and Tess for all that you do.
Thank you Lesley, and thank you so much for watching. Kind regards, Ruth
Breaking the censors—that’s the critical project of the age. Thank you for your service. Click the link for an advanced draft copy of my new book about what is going on, Cassandra’s Memo, COVID and the Global Psychopaths. I will distribute it free. https://pr.bookfunnel.com/jfbafaf All comments and critiques are appreciated. robertyoho.substack.com
Excellent interview
I can’t find the peace keepers website as it doesn’t seem to be the .Co.Uk mentioned .
Anyone has the correct wen address for them ?
Hi, apologies is it https://peacekeepers.org.uk
Kind regards, Ruth
Much Thanks
I'm gonna watch this now.
Thanks for all you do.
~~~~
ps - I'm gonna say something right off that might be off base, but I appreciate that your image is on the right side versus the left when you are talking with your guest. That is not how it often is done and that is not a coincidence and so I appreciate somebody's conscious choice to present the interview as such.
pss - off course I won't take this to an extreme, but I've listened to the beginning and I agree, now just to get a bit 3-dimensional for a moment, my initial ps sentiment above was based upon me watching an image of you and your guest on the screen. If there happened to be somebody watching from the other side, the what is to my right per my perspective, would be to their left (being they are looking from the opposite side). So, my point is that the concepts of "right" and "left" are really subjective. But, with that said, the concepts of folks caring about each other and working together as a group and a community - I think this concepts are built into our brains and I think many realize - tis time for a change. A change for the better.
~
So to conclude,
Thank-you for all your efforts.
Peace is what I want.
BK
Thank you, Buffalo Ken, for watching and your observations are gratefully received and something we should take into consideration. Kind regards, Ruth
Now I see you are fixing to startup your own Substack and God-Speed to you.
I don't think I ever will on my own account because I have said about all I got to say.
I've been screaming in the wind, whistling, hoping, praying for better times.
I support your efforts.
Peace is easy.
BK
You know it raises the question - who is asking the questions and who in answering? Sometimes the waters are muddy on this, but usually per some convention long ago agreed I reckon, where I reside the one asking the question is on the screen on the left.
In this instance, being this is Tess's place and she was the one hosting the interview, it seemed to be the opposite of convention and that simply is all I appreciated.
When it comes to ideas about ways to get together, I've been trying to share what I think and I appreciate others doing likewise, so I appreciate you and your efforts as well.
So, consideration is not requested, but if given tis appreciated and I think this mainly.
Together we are better.
Peace and thank-you for your response.
BK
This clip won't play. Sad because I really want to hear this
Great talk, it resonates deeply within me. I am sovereign. Thank you both 👏👏❤️
The very idea of a sovereign citizen rooted in our Greco-Roman Antiquity belongs in a conversation like this.
Fantastic interview. Thanks to you both.