It could be something simple like ivermectin is a spermicide at high doses.
The health benefits of ivermectin would be bad (using narcissistic reversal of values), because smarter/informed, healthier humans are a threat to unwarranted elitism (exploitation and total control).
Dear Dr. Tess. We have never met but I have to say I feel a great fondness for you. It goes without saying you are a very smart capable woman. You are also a dear and lovely person, with so much real care for your fellow humans behind all that you are doing. Dr. Mike Yeadon brings on a similar response from somewhere deep in my heart. If he says something, there must be something to it, which is to say you are wise to pay heed and look into it. From the little experience I have had with Ivermectin it is an amazing wonder drug. Still, any drug at extremely high dosage is likely to cause some harm, so both claims about Ivermectin are likely true and it just remains to be found where the tipping point or points lie. Whether the maniacs wanting depopulation actually pulled off this big an existential chess play with Ivermectin I think is unlikely but maybe they are, in fact, as smart as they are malevolent. Hmmm. Something else to think about.
It has been broadly used in livestock for years. Seems to be given to animals at various stages of development with no negative effects on fertility or pregnancy. In cattle, the cows reached reproductive age 3 months earlier and had better pelvic development than the untreated cows. Experiments done in rams found no damage to testes or sperm. After decades farmers and ranchers would have noticed dire fertility effects. It is also given to both adults and children in Africa for years
it is likely that the globalists have (mis)read those same studies which is why they supported the (quasi-hidden) distribution of ivermectin in the billions. and, for some reason this does make me kind of want to laugh! they 'accidentally' supported the health of the recipients they were trying to hurt! and globalists were either disappointed in the results. or... and, even more 'funny', quite likely they are suffering from their own form of mass hysteria and/or self-delusions and so misread the effects on people. to what extent were reduced birth rates, to the extent they were some, the result of better economic well being and/or hygiene? it has been documented (for example, in 'Sex and Destiny: The Politics of Human Fertility' by Germaine Greer) that increased disposable income is directly negatively correlated with birth rates. And of course, improved health puts less demand on high birth rates to counter the death associated with poor hygiene.
life really does have a wicked sense of humour!
great post!
all the best with what is changing. everything changes.
The Yeadon claims of ivermection causing fertility issues set off the bullshit alarm immediately. Ivermectin use is rampant in Africa and they have an overpopulation problem...despite all of Gates’ efforts☠️
The fertility rate in Africa overall started reducing 7 years before ivermectin was available. It continued to reduce afterwards. But the fertility rates of those countries using ivermectin regularly against river blindness have always been more than those countries that do not use it!
No 'overpopulation problem' anywhere worldwide - despite the century or more of lies, propaganda to scare people about this. The planet is underpopulated & all 8 billion or so humans do not take up much space relative to planet size. This deception is seen as fact by so many people that the billionaire psychopaths telling the lie, have succeeded in making many people hate themselves & other people for 'selfishly destroying the planet' so human life stops being sacred & depopulation by 'wars', suicides, 'pandemics'seen as 'necessary' Pure evil rulers.
I agree that despite trusting Yeadon somewhat due to him warning that the 'vaccines' ( he helped to create prev iously) are very toxic, Ivermectin has some 50 years of use globally with no known ill effects at normal dosages. So what has Mr Yeadon discovered that suddenly makes IVM so dangerous for fertility? I need to see his evidence of course to decide. Like others on here say, the psycho globalists may well have now modified IVM so it includes the deadly 'vax" ingadients & hence is able to damage fertility.. Its very strange that Yeadon is saying this, if he is. Has he been mind controlled/bought/ threatened so that he has changed sides? Was he ever a 'good guy'? So much controlled opposition that its not a bad idea to be very wary. Has anyone seen the evidence he provides for his warning?
Perhaps we all should take a step back and understand Dr. Yeadon's comments better before accusing him of BS. He has been right on nearly everything of what's been going on these last 4+ years, and in the cases where he was wrong (early on) he admits it and has changed his views accordingly. He says he is in the camp of "not harming people" and I believe, he wants people to be cautious. Here is his telegram channel where he spoke about ivermectin:
"However, there’s an extensive body of evidence in multiple species (mice, rats and rabbits at least) all showing adverse effects in reproduction. It’s not a case of “insufficient evidence to condemn it”. I am in the camp that I need to be sure I’m not harming people. We lack definitive evidence of safety in this regard and there’s much troubling information."
Dr. Paul Marik said in a Dec 2020 news conference in Houston, Texas that ivermectin "was a gift".
Just this past week, Dr. Paul Marik and Dr. Pierre Kory had certifications revoked. I think the best information is obtained when looking thoroughly at what is censured, disparaged, diminished.
Reminds me of hearing that there are some really big pediatric practices in the U.S. that don't have any patients with autism..... are they giving large amounts of vitamin c before, during, after vaccines? or are they skipping childhood vaccines all together?? or giving them only to well children, or to no black boys until they are 3, or space appropriately far apart ??? .
the idea that the current situation of medicine in the U.S. can be trusted is the 1 think I am sure of ..... it can not be trusted. Everything must be reexamined from multiple angles. Do alot of research.
The best information can be found where things are being censured, disparaged and diminished. And once you find the good sources .. it will feel like you are drinking the truth from a fire hose
This is very wrong.
"The American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) has revoked certification for two physicians known for leading an organization that promotes ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19.
Pierre Kory, MD, is no longer certified in critical care medicine, pulmonary disease, and
Re: Autism….i apologize I can’t find the source, but meta-analysis of WHEN the MMR (combined) vaccine is administered points to those who receive it BEFORE 3 years of age have elevated risk of developing autism. So doctors have been asking manufacturers to Split the MMR shot into 3 separate ones (like they used to be), but the manufacturers have so far refused. Very suss.
Because some ranchers are using ivermectin to control internal parasites, I asked Brave AI: Does ivermectin kill dung beetles?
Based on the provided search results, ivermectin has been shown to have a negative effect on dung beetles. Here are the key findings:
Sub-lethal disorders: Low doses of ivermectin cause sensory and locomotor disorders in dung beetles, affecting their olfactory and locomotor capacity (Verdú et al., 2015).
Population decline: Research suggests that the use of ivermectin in livestock may contribute to the decline of dung beetle populations in Mediterranean ecosystems (Verdú et al., 2015).
Disruption of ecosystem functioning: Ivermectin residues in dung can disrupt dung beetle diversity, soil properties, and ecosystem functioning (Lumaret et al., 2018).
Impaired dung beetle behavior: Ivermectin treatments for cattle can affect the attraction of dung beetles to cow pats, with some species being repelled or attracted to treated dung (Errouissi et al., 2010).
Long-term effects: The use of ivermectin can have long-term consequences for dung beetle populations and ecosystem functioning, even after the initial treatment has worn off (Lumaret et al., 2018).
In summary, ivermectin has been shown to have a negative impact on dung beetles, affecting their behavior, population dynamics, and ecosystem functioning.
Thanks so much for pointing this out! The effect on natural ecosystems is very important aspect to be considered with the widespread use of drugs in livestock and humans.
I think your summary and assessment of the short and long term effects are objective. We don't know everything but what we do know suggests there is no need for alarm. Maybe Tim Truth is controlled opposition, he seems to be spreading misinformation.
there is an easy check ...... India .... the government of Uttar Pradesh gave ivermectin and doxycycline to everyone in Uttar Pradesh, the 2nd largest state in India by population (210 million population compared to 330 million population of U.S. ) in Sept 2020 and got the "ivermectin spike", the immediate dropping like a rock numbers of cases and numbers of deaths ...... all of India gave ivermectin to everyone in May 2021 and got the ivermectin spike ......... and all of Japan in August 2021 got the ivermectin spike ....... is India experiencing any dropping in birth rates in the last 3 years ?
.... even if so, how could it be determined to be from ivermectin or from the vaccines?
then why not just give it to everyone over 65 who are not planning "to conceive and to grow babies to term".
there is so much of the $1 trillion a year in profits at stake and the power and media that it buys ....in the U.S. medical pharmaceutical monopoly by the use of vitamin c as a therapeutic, vitamin d for levels of 40-60, even 60-80, and ivermectin (because microorganisms (parasites, viruses, fungi, mold, etc) are the source of all illness, disease, cancer..... search on cancer as parasitic disease ...... check out detailed research and case studies here download this book for free as a pdf .... ) . https://drclarkstore.com/collections/dr-hulda-clark-books/products/the-cure-for-all-diseases
Hi Tess, thanks for putting out your thoughtful article here with such openness. This is such a tough situation here - a very powerful group of elite people operating in secret and for sure, potentially they could be tricking us - a real worry for both thought leaders and the awake in general. Be it tricking us through Ivermectin or something else we think is good, despite any differences we have over what is what, this concern is something we do have in common.
Wouldn't it be so much easier if we could just see these evildoers operating openly? If we could, we could define them and remove most things from the table as a potential trap. Instead, the situation is somewhat nebulous so it is hard to rest easy when so many things could be their infiltration.
At times like these, enjoying the normal things in life, what we have right in front of us is most important. Then we regain our foundations so shaken by these events and our certainty with it. Can't build reality off a suspicion!
However it is important to be seen to be reacting to a potential threat like you have but let's say we don't quite manage? Thinking about it, we could look like a thought zombie to another person, someone captured by the elite who is following a linear path leading to a preordained dead end. In this way, we may cease to exist to them when the stakes are life and death.
Life bustles and is full of change, that's what needs to be seen.
Your response was pretty ace tbh and I wish you luck in your efforts. Love to see you find more creative people too!
Thanks Stephen. With the corrupted information ecology, it certainly is a tricky landscape to navigate. This is why I advocate for everyone taking responsibility and trusting one's common sense and intuition over other authorities. It has been said that intuition is the most powerful epistemic tool we have. We should get better at trusting it.
Great work Tess. To be honest I was very surprised to see and hear what "appears" to be Mike Yeadon jumping to those conclusions with a single study and without scrutinizing the dose as you did Tess. AND to be throwing generalized suspicion on his peers seems to me to be out of character and non-typical of the man we all loved and respected.
I know with AI and CGI, videos can be made to say and do anything they are designed to do. So, the authenticity of the video itself should be challenged and scrutinized as well.
Trevor Osborne | Co-founder, United Health Alliance
Thank you for responding to this issue and offering to dialogue with my other favourite member of the resistance. The first question that you pose, however, may not be a valid argument against the ivm-is-toxic position.
"If the globalists are secretly pro-ivermectin and are delighted that its widespread use for worms and other infections, inflammation, and cancer will contribute to genocide, why are all the doctors who use ivermectin being censored and losing their licences? Why aren’t we being embraced into the globalist fold and showered with Gates’ money and media coverage?"
All PsyOps cater for different target groups. Don't you think it is highly likely that apart from the MSM propaganda, there were manufactured "truth tellers" for those who didn't fall for Narrative A, and that these would be cast in a theatre in which the appearance of censorship and "persecution" was part of the play which would be exposed as a fraud if the globalists "embraced" them? They have to remain in place as "limited hangouts" to narrow the spectrum of debate.
Not that I'm suggesting you are working for globalists (in fact I'm really hoping you aren't!), but it's quite possible that some well-known "resistance heroes" you know are.
Thank you Dr. Lawrie! Yes, let's start using common sense PLEASE!
It could be something simple like ivermectin is a spermicide at high doses.
The health benefits of ivermectin would be bad (using narcissistic reversal of values), because smarter/informed, healthier humans are a threat to unwarranted elitism (exploitation and total control).
Dear Dr. Tess. We have never met but I have to say I feel a great fondness for you. It goes without saying you are a very smart capable woman. You are also a dear and lovely person, with so much real care for your fellow humans behind all that you are doing. Dr. Mike Yeadon brings on a similar response from somewhere deep in my heart. If he says something, there must be something to it, which is to say you are wise to pay heed and look into it. From the little experience I have had with Ivermectin it is an amazing wonder drug. Still, any drug at extremely high dosage is likely to cause some harm, so both claims about Ivermectin are likely true and it just remains to be found where the tipping point or points lie. Whether the maniacs wanting depopulation actually pulled off this big an existential chess play with Ivermectin I think is unlikely but maybe they are, in fact, as smart as they are malevolent. Hmmm. Something else to think about.
Thank you KFH, I agree. We should keep an open mind - money and power can buy an awful lot of menace and madness.
and has donelook how mostofus went mad over thefl got dna fuckiing fuckinhow mad werewe?
It has been broadly used in livestock for years. Seems to be given to animals at various stages of development with no negative effects on fertility or pregnancy. In cattle, the cows reached reproductive age 3 months earlier and had better pelvic development than the untreated cows. Experiments done in rams found no damage to testes or sperm. After decades farmers and ranchers would have noticed dire fertility effects. It is also given to both adults and children in Africa for years
The only difference between medicine and poison is the dose☠️
thank you tess!
it is likely that the globalists have (mis)read those same studies which is why they supported the (quasi-hidden) distribution of ivermectin in the billions. and, for some reason this does make me kind of want to laugh! they 'accidentally' supported the health of the recipients they were trying to hurt! and globalists were either disappointed in the results. or... and, even more 'funny', quite likely they are suffering from their own form of mass hysteria and/or self-delusions and so misread the effects on people. to what extent were reduced birth rates, to the extent they were some, the result of better economic well being and/or hygiene? it has been documented (for example, in 'Sex and Destiny: The Politics of Human Fertility' by Germaine Greer) that increased disposable income is directly negatively correlated with birth rates. And of course, improved health puts less demand on high birth rates to counter the death associated with poor hygiene.
life really does have a wicked sense of humour!
great post!
all the best with what is changing. everything changes.
The Yeadon claims of ivermection causing fertility issues set off the bullshit alarm immediately. Ivermectin use is rampant in Africa and they have an overpopulation problem...despite all of Gates’ efforts☠️
The fertility rate in Africa overall started reducing 7 years before ivermectin was available. It continued to reduce afterwards. But the fertility rates of those countries using ivermectin regularly against river blindness have always been more than those countries that do not use it!
No 'overpopulation problem' anywhere worldwide - despite the century or more of lies, propaganda to scare people about this. The planet is underpopulated & all 8 billion or so humans do not take up much space relative to planet size. This deception is seen as fact by so many people that the billionaire psychopaths telling the lie, have succeeded in making many people hate themselves & other people for 'selfishly destroying the planet' so human life stops being sacred & depopulation by 'wars', suicides, 'pandemics'seen as 'necessary' Pure evil rulers.
I agree that despite trusting Yeadon somewhat due to him warning that the 'vaccines' ( he helped to create prev iously) are very toxic, Ivermectin has some 50 years of use globally with no known ill effects at normal dosages. So what has Mr Yeadon discovered that suddenly makes IVM so dangerous for fertility? I need to see his evidence of course to decide. Like others on here say, the psycho globalists may well have now modified IVM so it includes the deadly 'vax" ingadients & hence is able to damage fertility.. Its very strange that Yeadon is saying this, if he is. Has he been mind controlled/bought/ threatened so that he has changed sides? Was he ever a 'good guy'? So much controlled opposition that its not a bad idea to be very wary. Has anyone seen the evidence he provides for his warning?
70 years probably
Perhaps we all should take a step back and understand Dr. Yeadon's comments better before accusing him of BS. He has been right on nearly everything of what's been going on these last 4+ years, and in the cases where he was wrong (early on) he admits it and has changed his views accordingly. He says he is in the camp of "not harming people" and I believe, he wants people to be cautious. Here is his telegram channel where he spoke about ivermectin:
"However, there’s an extensive body of evidence in multiple species (mice, rats and rabbits at least) all showing adverse effects in reproduction. It’s not a case of “insufficient evidence to condemn it”. I am in the camp that I need to be sure I’m not harming people. We lack definitive evidence of safety in this regard and there’s much troubling information."
Dr. Paul Marik said in a Dec 2020 news conference in Houston, Texas that ivermectin "was a gift".
Just this past week, Dr. Paul Marik and Dr. Pierre Kory had certifications revoked. I think the best information is obtained when looking thoroughly at what is censured, disparaged, diminished.
Dr. Paul Marik found a protocol for sepsis with a less than 1% mortality rate around 2016/2017 and there has been an all out effort to disparage that https://www.faim.org/interview-with-dr-paul-marik-on-vitamin-c-protocol-for-sepsis ..... even though in 2020 I read it is used in 10% of U.S. hospitals.
Reminds me of hearing that there are some really big pediatric practices in the U.S. that don't have any patients with autism..... are they giving large amounts of vitamin c before, during, after vaccines? or are they skipping childhood vaccines all together?? or giving them only to well children, or to no black boys until they are 3, or space appropriately far apart ??? .
the idea that the current situation of medicine in the U.S. can be trusted is the 1 think I am sure of ..... it can not be trusted. Everything must be reexamined from multiple angles. Do alot of research.
The best information can be found where things are being censured, disparaged and diminished. And once you find the good sources .. it will feel like you are drinking the truth from a fire hose
This is very wrong.
"The American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) has revoked certification for two physicians known for leading an organization that promotes ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19.
Pierre Kory, MD, is no longer certified in critical care medicine, pulmonary disease, and
internal medicine, according to the ABIM website. Paul Ellis Marik, MD, is no longer certified in critical care medicine or internal medicine. " https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/abim-revokes-certification-two-physicians-accused-covid-2024a1000f0w?form=fpf
Re: Autism….i apologize I can’t find the source, but meta-analysis of WHEN the MMR (combined) vaccine is administered points to those who receive it BEFORE 3 years of age have elevated risk of developing autism. So doctors have been asking manufacturers to Split the MMR shot into 3 separate ones (like they used to be), but the manufacturers have so far refused. Very suss.
This spacing of shots is exactly what Andrew Wakefield was proposing in his OG vaxx study. That, and more study, of course.
Japan forced the split there.
Because some ranchers are using ivermectin to control internal parasites, I asked Brave AI: Does ivermectin kill dung beetles?
Based on the provided search results, ivermectin has been shown to have a negative effect on dung beetles. Here are the key findings:
Sub-lethal disorders: Low doses of ivermectin cause sensory and locomotor disorders in dung beetles, affecting their olfactory and locomotor capacity (Verdú et al., 2015).
Population decline: Research suggests that the use of ivermectin in livestock may contribute to the decline of dung beetle populations in Mediterranean ecosystems (Verdú et al., 2015).
Disruption of ecosystem functioning: Ivermectin residues in dung can disrupt dung beetle diversity, soil properties, and ecosystem functioning (Lumaret et al., 2018).
Impaired dung beetle behavior: Ivermectin treatments for cattle can affect the attraction of dung beetles to cow pats, with some species being repelled or attracted to treated dung (Errouissi et al., 2010).
Long-term effects: The use of ivermectin can have long-term consequences for dung beetle populations and ecosystem functioning, even after the initial treatment has worn off (Lumaret et al., 2018).
In summary, ivermectin has been shown to have a negative impact on dung beetles, affecting their behavior, population dynamics, and ecosystem functioning.
Thanks so much for pointing this out! The effect on natural ecosystems is very important aspect to be considered with the widespread use of drugs in livestock and humans.
I think your summary and assessment of the short and long term effects are objective. We don't know everything but what we do know suggests there is no need for alarm. Maybe Tim Truth is controlled opposition, he seems to be spreading misinformation.
there is an easy check ...... India .... the government of Uttar Pradesh gave ivermectin and doxycycline to everyone in Uttar Pradesh, the 2nd largest state in India by population (210 million population compared to 330 million population of U.S. ) in Sept 2020 and got the "ivermectin spike", the immediate dropping like a rock numbers of cases and numbers of deaths ...... all of India gave ivermectin to everyone in May 2021 and got the ivermectin spike ......... and all of Japan in August 2021 got the ivermectin spike ....... is India experiencing any dropping in birth rates in the last 3 years ?
.... even if so, how could it be determined to be from ivermectin or from the vaccines?
then why not just give it to everyone over 65 who are not planning "to conceive and to grow babies to term".
there is so much of the $1 trillion a year in profits at stake and the power and media that it buys ....in the U.S. medical pharmaceutical monopoly by the use of vitamin c as a therapeutic, vitamin d for levels of 40-60, even 60-80, and ivermectin (because microorganisms (parasites, viruses, fungi, mold, etc) are the source of all illness, disease, cancer..... search on cancer as parasitic disease ...... check out detailed research and case studies here download this book for free as a pdf .... ) . https://drclarkstore.com/collections/dr-hulda-clark-books/products/the-cure-for-all-diseases
Hi Tess, thanks for putting out your thoughtful article here with such openness. This is such a tough situation here - a very powerful group of elite people operating in secret and for sure, potentially they could be tricking us - a real worry for both thought leaders and the awake in general. Be it tricking us through Ivermectin or something else we think is good, despite any differences we have over what is what, this concern is something we do have in common.
Wouldn't it be so much easier if we could just see these evildoers operating openly? If we could, we could define them and remove most things from the table as a potential trap. Instead, the situation is somewhat nebulous so it is hard to rest easy when so many things could be their infiltration.
At times like these, enjoying the normal things in life, what we have right in front of us is most important. Then we regain our foundations so shaken by these events and our certainty with it. Can't build reality off a suspicion!
However it is important to be seen to be reacting to a potential threat like you have but let's say we don't quite manage? Thinking about it, we could look like a thought zombie to another person, someone captured by the elite who is following a linear path leading to a preordained dead end. In this way, we may cease to exist to them when the stakes are life and death.
Life bustles and is full of change, that's what needs to be seen.
Your response was pretty ace tbh and I wish you luck in your efforts. Love to see you find more creative people too!
Thanks Stephen. With the corrupted information ecology, it certainly is a tricky landscape to navigate. This is why I advocate for everyone taking responsibility and trusting one's common sense and intuition over other authorities. It has been said that intuition is the most powerful epistemic tool we have. We should get better at trusting it.
Great work Tess. To be honest I was very surprised to see and hear what "appears" to be Mike Yeadon jumping to those conclusions with a single study and without scrutinizing the dose as you did Tess. AND to be throwing generalized suspicion on his peers seems to me to be out of character and non-typical of the man we all loved and respected.
I know with AI and CGI, videos can be made to say and do anything they are designed to do. So, the authenticity of the video itself should be challenged and scrutinized as well.
Trevor Osborne | Co-founder, United Health Alliance
Good point
Yeadon has been played.
Until he identifies the name of the person
Who so adamantly pushed the “dossier”
Yeadon will continue to be duped by the effort.
It won’t be the first time.
‘Like it or not.
… Every doctor of medicine is a dupe.
It is simply a matter of degree.
Please close your quote. Love the playfulness of the last line!
Oh what a tangled web they weave. Thank you for helping to untangle their lethal deceptions, Doctor.
Ivermectin has been widely used in livestock for years. If it had a negative effect on fertility, farmers and ranchers would have noticed by now.
Thank you for responding to this issue and offering to dialogue with my other favourite member of the resistance. The first question that you pose, however, may not be a valid argument against the ivm-is-toxic position.
"If the globalists are secretly pro-ivermectin and are delighted that its widespread use for worms and other infections, inflammation, and cancer will contribute to genocide, why are all the doctors who use ivermectin being censored and losing their licences? Why aren’t we being embraced into the globalist fold and showered with Gates’ money and media coverage?"
All PsyOps cater for different target groups. Don't you think it is highly likely that apart from the MSM propaganda, there were manufactured "truth tellers" for those who didn't fall for Narrative A, and that these would be cast in a theatre in which the appearance of censorship and "persecution" was part of the play which would be exposed as a fraud if the globalists "embraced" them? They have to remain in place as "limited hangouts" to narrow the spectrum of debate.
Not that I'm suggesting you are working for globalists (in fact I'm really hoping you aren't!), but it's quite possible that some well-known "resistance heroes" you know are.
I have every trust in you Dr Tess. As for any potential fertility side effects I think at 63 years of age I can sleep easy.