Share this comment
I am an MD and IMHO the doctors ARE to blame for injury caused as a result of their advice to patients to take these shots.
No doctor is obligated to obey the State!
Doctors are obliged to disobey the state if it directs the doctor to do something that is injurious to the patient.
Doctors also have a legal obligation to remain knowledgeable…
I am an MD and IMHO the doctors ARE to blame for injury caused as a result of their advice to patients to take these shots.
No doctor is obligated to obey the State!
Doctors are obliged to disobey the state if it directs the doctor to do something that is injurious to the patient.
Doctors also have a legal obligation to remain knowledgeable. "I didn't know" is not an excuse for medical malpractice.
As I see it when this mRNA vaccine was announced my colleagues should have recognized that they had never heard of an mRNA vaccine and looked it up and upon learning what was in it and the paucity of controlled studies performed realized that it could be harmful and decide NOT to give it or advise people to take it until safety was fully determined.
The doctors who advised patients to take this and or administered it without knowledge of the science behind it ARE to blame for the adverse consequences.
This is very similar to the NAZI doctors. In Hitler's Germany any doctor refusing to participate in the murder was considered to be a consientious objector. They may have been ousted from clubs ad or professional societies but so what???
YES THE STATE IS RESPONSIBLE BUT DOCTORS WHO OBEYED THE STATE OVER THEIR OBLIGATION TO PATIENTS ARE ALSO RESPONSIBLE. AND REMEMBER; NOT ALL OF US WENT ALONG WITH THIS!
Amen to that Creole Gumbo
Well presented and a true indictment on the medical "professions" from top to bottom who failed to do what was right for their patients.
A spot on structured argument.
Thank you so much. The really sad thing is that doctors who are employees seemed to have forgotten that their encounters with patients are private. All that would have been necessary was to just not mention the vax OR if the patient asked to respond by saying that safety and efficacy have not yet been established. There would be no real need for the employer hospital to fire the doctor if it is not documented by the doctor.
EXAMPLE: My husband is a cardiologist and saw an airline pilot who asked "Doctor, what do you think of the shot?" His reply was "I don't think it is safe or effective." The patient was delighted to hear that. I compare it to my own encounter with a cardiologist at the same facility who said to me "I see that you are an antivaxer (not true as I have had every vax except for TB) and I highly recommend that you take the CV19 AND your yearly flu shot." He was shilling for the institution and the CDC and had a fund of knowledge well BELOW my own. I found it disgusting.
Well said. There is responsibility at all levels and that includes ourselves, doctors or not.
Thank you for reading it.