The fact that one may be sick with non typical flu-like symptoms or even more severe symptoms than the usual flu does not prove that a virus (such as Covid) caused those symptoms and such belief does not debunk the "no virus theory"; but real evidence is found in the fact that the "virus" has never been cultured and isolated by anyone, a…
The fact that one may be sick with non typical flu-like symptoms or even more severe symptoms than the usual flu does not prove that a virus (such as Covid) caused those symptoms and such belief does not debunk the "no virus theory"; but real evidence is found in the fact that the "virus" has never been cultured and isolated by anyone, anywhere in spite of claims to the contrary; McCullough makes the same case as you do while claiming that the "virus" was cultured and isolated by the Chinese and fully identified...which is quite simply and clearly NOT the case!
The problem is, it doesn't prove it isn't a virus either. If someone has experienced a viral like illness spreading through their family and friends, something with an incubation period after direct contact, experienced this over and over and over (my husband caught covid 5xs from others who were sick) who has a right to gaslight them and demand they deny the existence of contagion? Who has a right to diagnose someone with something that does not fit the disease presentation? Who has a right to say it is all EMF when EMF didn't exist back when I got chicken pox as a child and every flu virus circulating at school. What right does anyone have to distort other people's reality, say what they are allowed to use as proof of their personal illness as if they are the arbiters of truth and gatekeepers of my family's health and disease?
Have you personally ever researched virus isolation?For example people who don't believe in viruses throw out the excuse that they are cultured in monkey kidney cells. Do you know why they use monkey kidney cells? In the 1960's they found a monkey kidney cells line that did not have interferon alpha. The cells could not fight off viral infections and were therefore perfect for replicating viruses.
Not only does this backup how important the immune system is and it's production of interferon alpha in order to fight infections, it also shows why some people are more susceptible than others.Why not every single person who becomes infected?Develop symptoms or gets severely sick.Because each one of us has a unique immune system.
Every part of virus isolation and replication has logical reasons. Those who do not want to take the time to understand who want to call it very unreasonable and complex are welcome to do so but it doesn't make them arbiters of truth
Thank you for taking the time to explain the ground truths.
For others who are on the fence, take a trip to PubMed and search for "virus human" and limit the date range to max 2019 if you want to ignore covid.
You will see that a LOT of published peer reviewed papers describe the MANY aspects of viral research. Many of the researchers have no conflicts of interest (some surely have in some direction) yet viruses are studied because they behaves like a virus.
The fact that one may be sick with non typical flu-like symptoms or even more severe symptoms than the usual flu does not prove that a virus (such as Covid) caused those symptoms and such belief does not debunk the "no virus theory"; but real evidence is found in the fact that the "virus" has never been cultured and isolated by anyone, anywhere in spite of claims to the contrary; McCullough makes the same case as you do while claiming that the "virus" was cultured and isolated by the Chinese and fully identified...which is quite simply and clearly NOT the case!
The problem is, it doesn't prove it isn't a virus either. If someone has experienced a viral like illness spreading through their family and friends, something with an incubation period after direct contact, experienced this over and over and over (my husband caught covid 5xs from others who were sick) who has a right to gaslight them and demand they deny the existence of contagion? Who has a right to diagnose someone with something that does not fit the disease presentation? Who has a right to say it is all EMF when EMF didn't exist back when I got chicken pox as a child and every flu virus circulating at school. What right does anyone have to distort other people's reality, say what they are allowed to use as proof of their personal illness as if they are the arbiters of truth and gatekeepers of my family's health and disease?
Have you personally ever researched virus isolation?For example people who don't believe in viruses throw out the excuse that they are cultured in monkey kidney cells. Do you know why they use monkey kidney cells? In the 1960's they found a monkey kidney cells line that did not have interferon alpha. The cells could not fight off viral infections and were therefore perfect for replicating viruses.
Not only does this backup how important the immune system is and it's production of interferon alpha in order to fight infections, it also shows why some people are more susceptible than others.Why not every single person who becomes infected?Develop symptoms or gets severely sick.Because each one of us has a unique immune system.
Every part of virus isolation and replication has logical reasons. Those who do not want to take the time to understand who want to call it very unreasonable and complex are welcome to do so but it doesn't make them arbiters of truth
Ditto.
Thank you for taking the time to explain the ground truths.
For others who are on the fence, take a trip to PubMed and search for "virus human" and limit the date range to max 2019 if you want to ignore covid.
You will see that a LOT of published peer reviewed papers describe the MANY aspects of viral research. Many of the researchers have no conflicts of interest (some surely have in some direction) yet viruses are studied because they behaves like a virus.