$€£ etc etc etc ...... They see us as animals to be farmed that is all. I remember a pharma CEO being asked a couple of short years ago on the BBC or wherever about the idea that pharma wanted people ill and he for some reason gave a totally honest answer; he said we want people to be ill but not so ill they can't work to pay for their drugs.
When this Covid thing started and Trump mentioned Hydroxychloroquine I bought loads for my family as it wasn't even on prescription in the UK and my sister a district nurse at the time said why would you waste your money buying that as the NHS will give you it for free if it works. I told her that the grown man knows the world he lives in. It looks like we are all grown ups now.
I tried buying Ivermectin a few months back and it got from India to London and was turned back again by the UK government I presume. They stole my Ivermectin. That is who we are dealing with, liars and thieves.
They don't make money with us when we are healthy. They don't make money with us when we are dead. We have to be in between and this is where they will keep us for the rest of our life!
I think our misguided trust in media over science was years in the making and primed us for this outrageous crime on humanity. I was shocked to see so many flock to these experimental shots. I was afraid of the vaccine from the moment the virus was announced. I knew
all vaccines have potential long term sided effects and have been given false or too much credit for eradicating past disease from the planet. What I didn’t expect was a vaccine so wildly dangerous in the short term. The long term effects of all this are doubly concerning and yet to be realized.
Hello Tess -- I have followed you since last year and thrilled you have started a Substack newsletter.
This pandemic revealed the corruption, financial (dis)incentives, and blinkered thinking of a propagandized and brainwashed medical profession. The same thing has been going on for about 100 years but the full scale of the rot is finally becoming apparent. As you said, the concerns are now becoming mainstream. Let's hope they are enough to force deep changes.
Ascorbate as a treatment for so many diseases has been dismissed and mocked just as ivermectin has been. 45 years of propaganda. It's interesting to observe the parallels so we don't fall into the same traps again. Hopefully the immense damage done, and the fact that the losses were acute rather than chronic, enough to force change this time. Thank you for fighting the good fight.
Thank you for your courage and love for humanity. I think we are seeing the limitations of our current modes of civilization. We are undefended from predation by organized sociopaths. In my opinion, this operation has been planned for a long time and is only the opening act of a much larger war of the organized sociopathic elites on humanity. Modern technology of surveillance and social control and automation has made us redundant from their point of view. They want us gone, preferably with plausible deniability.
Hello Tess -- I have followed you since last year and thrilled you have started a Substack newsletter.
This pandemic revealed the corruption, financial (dis)incentives, and blinkered thinking of a propagandized and brainwashed medical profession. The same thing has been going on for about 100 years but the full scale of the rot is finally becoming apparent. As you said, the concerns are now becoming mainstream. Let's hope they are enough to force deep changes.
Ascorbate as a treatment for so many diseases has been dismissed and mocked just as ivermectin has been. 45 years of propaganda. It's interesting to observe the parallels so we don't fall into the same traps again. Hopefully the immense damage done, and the fact that the losses were acute rather than chronic, enough to force change this time. Thank you for fighting the good fight.
The disheartening reality is that there are people who do not have integrity nor walk in an ethical. They are unlike you Dr. Lawrie and as much as you hope, because your nature is unlike theirs, it is a long shot that those with flawed consciences will walk with earnest concern for others. Only God knows for sure if they will turn and walk a more humane path.
Big pharma and some unethical medical people live by the adage - 'There is no profit in you being healthy or dead, only in managing you through sickness.'
I read, years ago, that in ancient Chinese life... physicians were only compensated if their patient recovered. Some form of that concept would provide a self-controlled manner of ensuring better practices and outcomes, starting with the pharma groups.
Dr John Campbell (of the UK) also just uploaded strong, clear supportive evidence on his YouTube channel.
I've never understood this illogical thinking has been warranted by so many people. Tho we are the same human beings and have the same biology, a drug works in one country and doesn't work in another. I hope your message will reach as many ppl as possible.
Here is my good Dr Gerry Brady's response to the BBC response to my complaint. Sorry it's so long but it crucially exemplifies this articles points:
Hi Peter,
Groan ... the BBC are now handing out Medical advice. How worse can it get?
The mRNA into the DNA --
New Study Shows Pfizer mRNA Shot Becomes DNA In Just 6 Hours (Video) - The Washington Standard
CIMB | Free Full-Text | Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line (mdpi.com)
Dr Peter McCullough said that the Troponin levels in Covid Vaccine induced Myocarditis were "way higher" than those seen in conventional post viral Myocarditis. It is all about severity.
The vaccine does not prevent you from getting the virus so vaccine recipients carry cumulative risk in regard to Myocarditis -- risk from the vaccine PLUS risk from the virus.
Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally
I would suggest that the BBC "fact checkers" should check their medical degrees and increase their clinical experience.
DON'T attend their clinics (which don't exist).
Cheers, Gerry
==========
SPREAD THE WORD YOUR DAILY COVID NEWS (cmnnews.org)
FYI. This is what the BBC are saying in countering the their attack on Dr Malone. I don’t have enough succinct knowledge or information to effectively respond at this time. Can you help me here? Thus properly ‘armed’ I will respond via the BBC website and carry on the battle!
Subject: BBC Complaints - Case number CAS-7092002-Z0B3G0
Dear Mr Underwood
Thank you for getting in touch about the article by our Reality Check team fact-checking four claims made on a Spotify podcast by Joe Rogan.
Some readers felt we were wrong to say his claim that a vaccine was “essentially a gene therapy” was untrue. We checked this again and can confirm that the mRNA from Covid-19 vaccines does not enter the cell nucleus or interact with the DNA at all, so it does not constitute gene therapy.
The NHS’s genomics education programme confirms this and explains: “Gene therapies involve making deliberate changes to a patient’s DNA in order to cure or alleviate a genetic condition. This can be by adding a functional copy of a gene, disabling a gene that makes a faulty product or changing gene activation. The mRNA from the vaccines does not enter the cell nucleus or interact with the DNA at all, so it does not constitute gene therapy.”
Some readers were worried that the vaccines could cause Myocarditis. In fact studies show that overall it is more common from the virus than the vaccine and it also appears to cause worse outcomes.
Some readers questioned why we concluded that in “rigorously carried out studies, there is no evidence of the drug's effectiveness” against Covid-19. The world leaders in reviewing medical literature, Cochrane, looked at the whole body of literature on ivermectin. After removing all those that were too small, weak or showed significant signs of bias, based on the literature that was good enough to draw a conclusion, there was no evidence ivermectin was effective at treating Covid.
Some readers questioned why we had reported on a letter signed by more than 270 people following on from an appearance on the podcast by virologist Dr Robert Malone claiming that people vaccinated after having Covid-19 were at greater risk of side effects. Our article correctly described the open letter as being signed by “more than 270 people, mostly doctors and healthcare professionals”. The vast majority were physicians, nurses, pharmacists, public health workers and researchers in relevant fields including medicine, immunology and microbiology.
Thank you again for contacting us to make your views known. All feedback from readers is appreciated and shared with senior editors so that they are aware of audience concerns.
Please note: this email is sent from an unmonitored address so please don’t reply. If necessary please contact us through our webform (please include your case reference number).
Thise guys at the beeb are whacked aren't they? Sadly, I am sure, your reasoned arguments will be ignored.
Clearly it is very easy to appear authoritative on a contentious point if you ignore data that disagrees with your viewpoint!
As for the 270 signatories - they amplify the more credible and do not even mention the podcasters and influencers because the know it looks bad. Almost as bad as only 270 people were willing to ink up anyway. It's insulting and would be laughable if their zealous behaviour was not potentially so harmful to large portions of the population.
Their reply is patronising and not fact checking at all - it's narrative corroboration.
Regarding the mainstream media, it is the Trusted New Initiative which has prevented them from doing their jobs as investigative journalists.....however, what little has come to light should have propelled some to do a deep dive to confirm the truth they've been told. When the FDA tries to prevent the release to trial data for 75 years, someone should have been VERY uncomfortable about that. Someone should have realized that IF everything was legitimate, they should have welcomed the chance to provide proof of the safety and efficacy of these vaccines and fancy, patented new drugs. Did no one see what happened in Uttar Pradesh?
I so admire you physicians and scientists who are risking your reputations in the wider world but maintaining your integrity. Thank you so much.
$€£ etc etc etc ...... They see us as animals to be farmed that is all. I remember a pharma CEO being asked a couple of short years ago on the BBC or wherever about the idea that pharma wanted people ill and he for some reason gave a totally honest answer; he said we want people to be ill but not so ill they can't work to pay for their drugs.
When this Covid thing started and Trump mentioned Hydroxychloroquine I bought loads for my family as it wasn't even on prescription in the UK and my sister a district nurse at the time said why would you waste your money buying that as the NHS will give you it for free if it works. I told her that the grown man knows the world he lives in. It looks like we are all grown ups now.
I tried buying Ivermectin a few months back and it got from India to London and was turned back again by the UK government I presume. They stole my Ivermectin. That is who we are dealing with, liars and thieves.
They don't make money with us when we are healthy. They don't make money with us when we are dead. We have to be in between and this is where they will keep us for the rest of our life!
But the death itself, if in hospital, they make ALOT of money on that death...see this of a fella who rolled his car, and was 'inducted' into covid death ward, he escaped...https://rumble.com/vu2122-nazi-big-pharma-hospital-white-coats-try-to-kill-man.html
Yes unfortunately. They can take and sell parts of your body. It reminds me the movie COMA. Coma (1978) Official Trailer. https://youtu.be/pqUxB2l6N_Q
I think our misguided trust in media over science was years in the making and primed us for this outrageous crime on humanity. I was shocked to see so many flock to these experimental shots. I was afraid of the vaccine from the moment the virus was announced. I knew
all vaccines have potential long term sided effects and have been given false or too much credit for eradicating past disease from the planet. What I didn’t expect was a vaccine so wildly dangerous in the short term. The long term effects of all this are doubly concerning and yet to be realized.
Hello Tess -- I have followed you since last year and thrilled you have started a Substack newsletter.
This pandemic revealed the corruption, financial (dis)incentives, and blinkered thinking of a propagandized and brainwashed medical profession. The same thing has been going on for about 100 years but the full scale of the rot is finally becoming apparent. As you said, the concerns are now becoming mainstream. Let's hope they are enough to force deep changes.
Ascorbate as a treatment for so many diseases has been dismissed and mocked just as ivermectin has been. 45 years of propaganda. It's interesting to observe the parallels so we don't fall into the same traps again. Hopefully the immense damage done, and the fact that the losses were acute rather than chronic, enough to force change this time. Thank you for fighting the good fight.
https://themariachiyears.substack.com/p/modern-ignorance-and-ancient-wisdom-8c1?s=w
I’m hoping the recent study in Japan will help settle the score. Looking forward to the results being published.
Thank you for your courage and love for humanity. I think we are seeing the limitations of our current modes of civilization. We are undefended from predation by organized sociopaths. In my opinion, this operation has been planned for a long time and is only the opening act of a much larger war of the organized sociopathic elites on humanity. Modern technology of surveillance and social control and automation has made us redundant from their point of view. They want us gone, preferably with plausible deniability.
I watched Dr Tess Lawrie's video with Dr Hill. I cried. It was what I suspected for a long time but to see it was horrifying. Who to trust?
Hello Tess -- I have followed you since last year and thrilled you have started a Substack newsletter.
This pandemic revealed the corruption, financial (dis)incentives, and blinkered thinking of a propagandized and brainwashed medical profession. The same thing has been going on for about 100 years but the full scale of the rot is finally becoming apparent. As you said, the concerns are now becoming mainstream. Let's hope they are enough to force deep changes.
Ascorbate as a treatment for so many diseases has been dismissed and mocked just as ivermectin has been. 45 years of propaganda. It's interesting to observe the parallels so we don't fall into the same traps again. Hopefully the immense damage done, and the fact that the losses were acute rather than chronic, enough to force change this time. Thank you for fighting the good fight.
https://themariachiyears.substack.com/p/modern-ignorance-and-ancient-wisdom-8c1?s=w
Tess, have you seen Andrew's latest?
https://academic.oup.com/ofid/article/9/2/ofab645/6509922
I guess he is saying there are only 4 studies that meet his exacting standard.
The disheartening reality is that there are people who do not have integrity nor walk in an ethical. They are unlike you Dr. Lawrie and as much as you hope, because your nature is unlike theirs, it is a long shot that those with flawed consciences will walk with earnest concern for others. Only God knows for sure if they will turn and walk a more humane path.
Big pharma and some unethical medical people live by the adage - 'There is no profit in you being healthy or dead, only in managing you through sickness.'
I read, years ago, that in ancient Chinese life... physicians were only compensated if their patient recovered. Some form of that concept would provide a self-controlled manner of ensuring better practices and outcomes, starting with the pharma groups.
Dr John Campbell (of the UK) also just uploaded strong, clear supportive evidence on his YouTube channel.
I've never understood this illogical thinking has been warranted by so many people. Tho we are the same human beings and have the same biology, a drug works in one country and doesn't work in another. I hope your message will reach as many ppl as possible.
Here is my good Dr Gerry Brady's response to the BBC response to my complaint. Sorry it's so long but it crucially exemplifies this articles points:
Hi Peter,
Groan ... the BBC are now handing out Medical advice. How worse can it get?
The mRNA into the DNA --
New Study Shows Pfizer mRNA Shot Becomes DNA In Just 6 Hours (Video) - The Washington Standard
CIMB | Free Full-Text | Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line (mdpi.com)
Dr Peter McCullough said that the Troponin levels in Covid Vaccine induced Myocarditis were "way higher" than those seen in conventional post viral Myocarditis. It is all about severity.
The vaccine does not prevent you from getting the virus so vaccine recipients carry cumulative risk in regard to Myocarditis -- risk from the vaccine PLUS risk from the virus.
In regards to Ivermectin -- send this https://www.oraclefilms.com/alettertoandrewhill
Ivermectin efficacy in Covid is all about EARLY treatment -- it is about TIMING
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8248252/
Conclusions:
Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally
I would suggest that the BBC "fact checkers" should check their medical degrees and increase their clinical experience.
DON'T attend their clinics (which don't exist).
Cheers, Gerry
==========
SPREAD THE WORD YOUR DAILY COVID NEWS (cmnnews.org)
BOOM Finance & Economics (boomfinanceandeconomics.com)
BOOM Finance and Economics | Designed for Critical Thinkers — UPDATED WEEKLY (wordpress.com)
YOUR DAILY COVID NEWS
On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 6:39 AM Peter Underwood <peter@underco.co.uk> wrote:
Hi Gerry,
FYI. This is what the BBC are saying in countering the their attack on Dr Malone. I don’t have enough succinct knowledge or information to effectively respond at this time. Can you help me here? Thus properly ‘armed’ I will respond via the BBC website and carry on the battle!
Cheers
Peter
From: BBC Complaints [mailto:bbc_complaints_website@contact.bbc.co.uk]
Sent: 07 March 2022 13:09
To: Peter Underwood
Subject: BBC Complaints - Case number CAS-7092002-Z0B3G0
Dear Mr Underwood
Thank you for getting in touch about the article by our Reality Check team fact-checking four claims made on a Spotify podcast by Joe Rogan.
Some readers felt we were wrong to say his claim that a vaccine was “essentially a gene therapy” was untrue. We checked this again and can confirm that the mRNA from Covid-19 vaccines does not enter the cell nucleus or interact with the DNA at all, so it does not constitute gene therapy.
The NHS’s genomics education programme confirms this and explains: “Gene therapies involve making deliberate changes to a patient’s DNA in order to cure or alleviate a genetic condition. This can be by adding a functional copy of a gene, disabling a gene that makes a faulty product or changing gene activation. The mRNA from the vaccines does not enter the cell nucleus or interact with the DNA at all, so it does not constitute gene therapy.”
Some readers were worried that the vaccines could cause Myocarditis. In fact studies show that overall it is more common from the virus than the vaccine and it also appears to cause worse outcomes.
Some readers questioned why we concluded that in “rigorously carried out studies, there is no evidence of the drug's effectiveness” against Covid-19. The world leaders in reviewing medical literature, Cochrane, looked at the whole body of literature on ivermectin. After removing all those that were too small, weak or showed significant signs of bias, based on the literature that was good enough to draw a conclusion, there was no evidence ivermectin was effective at treating Covid.
Some readers questioned why we had reported on a letter signed by more than 270 people following on from an appearance on the podcast by virologist Dr Robert Malone claiming that people vaccinated after having Covid-19 were at greater risk of side effects. Our article correctly described the open letter as being signed by “more than 270 people, mostly doctors and healthcare professionals”. The vast majority were physicians, nurses, pharmacists, public health workers and researchers in relevant fields including medicine, immunology and microbiology.
Thank you again for contacting us to make your views known. All feedback from readers is appreciated and shared with senior editors so that they are aware of audience concerns.
Kind Regards,
BBC Complaints Team
www.bbc.co.uk/complaints
Please note: this email is sent from an unmonitored address so please don’t reply. If necessary please contact us through our webform (please include your case reference number).
Thise guys at the beeb are whacked aren't they? Sadly, I am sure, your reasoned arguments will be ignored.
Clearly it is very easy to appear authoritative on a contentious point if you ignore data that disagrees with your viewpoint!
As for the 270 signatories - they amplify the more credible and do not even mention the podcasters and influencers because the know it looks bad. Almost as bad as only 270 people were willing to ink up anyway. It's insulting and would be laughable if their zealous behaviour was not potentially so harmful to large portions of the population.
Their reply is patronising and not fact checking at all - it's narrative corroboration.
Just wanted to thank you Dr. Lawrie for your service to humanity. Your voice is so quiet and yet so powerful. Bless you.
how many other medicines are in circulation like ivermectin that could be repurposed ,I bet most MP s weren’t far away from a jar of IVM ,
I tried many times last year to make the point regarding what is there to loose to try using Ivermectin. The only respons I got was crickets…
Maybe I was shadowbanned by FB but too many also trust the governments…
Regarding the mainstream media, it is the Trusted New Initiative which has prevented them from doing their jobs as investigative journalists.....however, what little has come to light should have propelled some to do a deep dive to confirm the truth they've been told. When the FDA tries to prevent the release to trial data for 75 years, someone should have been VERY uncomfortable about that. Someone should have realized that IF everything was legitimate, they should have welcomed the chance to provide proof of the safety and efficacy of these vaccines and fancy, patented new drugs. Did no one see what happened in Uttar Pradesh?