Why do you think Dr Laurie receives funds to push IVM ? I am not convinced either way that it works or doesn’t work but to suggest she gets money to push this medication is silly given that it’s not a high price product.
Hello Alastair, we are funded entirely by public donation. All money that comes through this Substack also goes directly towards WCH work. I welcome constructive and respectful discussion and value the opinion of others, though it must be acknowledged that truth has been particularly elusive during the Covid crisis. If you would like to indicate which reviews you are referencing I would be happy to explain their limitations.
Thank you, Dr Lawrie: have any of your donations come from antivaccine organizations or anti-vaccine advocates (like Robert F Kennedy, Steve Kirsch etc)?
Why have you not withdrawn your meta-analysis, given the terribly weak and fraudulent studies you included (Elgazzar, Niaee, Petkov, Okumus, Hashim)?
When analysis is done without these studies, and including TOGETHER and I-Tech, there is no benefit.
I know this won’t change your mind, but I am interested in how a previously respected researcher disappeared down such a dark rabbit hole. Was it worth throwing away all professional credibility?
Mr McAlpine, you claim that ivermectin shows no benefit when the named 'flawed' studies are excluded and TOGETHER and I-Tech are included. Firstly, are you aware that the TOGETHER study itself is filled with flaws? If not, please educate yourself: https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/news/together-trial.
Please provide evidence, i.e. a systematic review/meta-analysis, which I am sure you have access to.
Secondly, if you demand that Dr Lawrie and her team retract their meta-analysis based on the inclusion of studies that have been described as 'flawed', I suggest you demand the same of the Popp et al. study: https://c19ivermectin.com/popp.html - amongst many others. In fact, you may want to demand the same of around 80% of all studies that have been commissioned by the pharmaceutical industry.
Thirdly, the term "anti-vaccine" is a weaponised term to denigrate individuals who have perfectly valid concerns about the safety of a medical intervention. If you look into what these people and organisations are calling for, you will find that all they demand is to properly safety-test these interventions before having them injected into the arms of infants. No more no less! After the disastrous handling of this covid crisis, it is no wonder that people have grown more sceptical of vaccinations in general.
More importantly, you are alluding that Dr Lawrie is compromised by financial interests. As a matter of fact, since becoming an advocate for early treatment and a critic of the covid injections, she has been taking a massive pay-cut and has to deal with public smear-campaigns against herself and her work. The same applies to fellow warriors, like Dr Kory or Prof Marik. Nobody puts themselves in this position, if they did not believe wholeheartedly that what they are standing up for is the right thing.
It is completely within your right to voice your concerns on this platform. However, rather than attacking Dr Lawrie for what she does, I would like to encourage you to take a step back and reflect on the question why medical regulators and governments are so keen on interfering with clinical practice-decisions of doctors, who wish to treat their covid patients with an FDA approved drug that has been around for decades and that is safer than aspirin. As a doctor you should know that prescribing off-licence drugs is part and parcel of your professional practice and nothing new. You may also want to reflect on the question why billions of people are being coerced and often mandated to take an injection that has no long-term safety profile and has already killed and disabled more people than all vaccinations administered over several decades put together. If you are actually an advocate of these intensely harmful injections, while demanding more evidence for ivermectin's safety and efficacy, I wonder if you could come to an awareness of how absurd this stance is.
When Utter Pradesh I think it was removed their chief medical officer due to suspicions she was being funded or influenced by big pharma in some way due to her intransegence in banning the use of Ivermectin and they then started using Ivermectin, but for some reason were not permitted by the WHO to say they were using Ivermectin, the numbers of people ill with Covid collapsed in that area containing hundreds of millions of people. Why did the collapse in Covid numbers happen never to return and why did the WHO prevent the Utter Pradesh government from saying what was in their free 5 day packs they handed out to everyone? And if I can say on a personal note if you aren't anti-vaccine after years in the medical profession then you have ignored your duty to frst do no harm.
Yet you are exerting considerable effort to dissuade others from availing themselves from a provably efficacious therapeutic. It's almost as if there is envy as your motivation.
Steve Kirsch - New study shows ivermectin can reduce chance of death by 92%
¨A new large prospective observational study of 88,000 people shows ivermectin works; the greater the dose, the better it works.¨
Regular use of ivermectin as prophylaxis for COVID-19 led up to 92% reduction in COVID-19 mortality rate in a dose-response manner: results of a prospective observational study of a strictly controlled population of 88,012 subjects among 223,128 participants.¨Read More https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/new-study-shows-ivermectin-can-reduce
Unfortunately for you, this is literally my job. And I am well-acquainted with the literature on this subject.
Lawrie’s meta-analysis is unreliable because it included studies that are either fraudulent (Elgazzar), non-randomized (Hashim, Okumus, Niaee), not published (Petkov) or extremely weak.
It’s why there’s an expression of concern from the publisher; often a prelude to retraction.
When we look at the larger, well-conducted RCTs (I-TECH, TOGETHER), we see no benefit. And when meta-analysis is done excluding the very weak studies (Cochrane), there is no evidence of benefit.
I would ask you to apologize for your insult, but I suspect you will not. True believers rarely do. All I can hope is that you realize that the science on ivermectin is clear: it doesn’t work. False accusations against physicians who actually see patients (unlike Dr Lawrie) won’t change that.
Mr McAlpine, you claim that ivermectin shows no benefit when the named 'flawed' studies are excluded and TOGETHER and I-Tech are included. Firstly, are you aware that the TOGETHER study itself is filled with flaws? If not, please educate yourself: https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/news/together-trial.
Please provide evidence, i.e. a systematic review/meta-analysis, which I am sure you have access to.
Secondly, if you demand that Dr Lawrie and her team retract their meta-analysis based on the inclusion of studies that have been described as 'flawed', I suggest you demand the same of the Popp et al. study: https://c19ivermectin.com/popp.html - amongst many others. In fact, you may want to demand the same of around 80% of all studies that have been commissioned by the pharmaceutical industry.
Thirdly, the term "anti-vaccine" is a weaponised term to denigrate individuals who have perfectly valid concerns about the safety of a medical intervention. If you look into what these people and organisations are calling for, you will find that all they demand is to properly safety-test these interventions before having them injected into the arms of infants. No more no less! After the disastrous handling of this covid crisis, it is no wonder that people have grown more sceptical of vaccinations in general.
More importantly, you are alluding that Dr Lawrie is compromised by financial interests. As a matter of fact, since becoming an advocate for early treatment and a critic of the covid injections, she has been taking a massive pay-cut and has to deal with public smear-campaigns against herself and her work. The same applies to fellow warriors, like Dr Kory or Prof Marik. Nobody puts themselves in this position, if they did not believe wholeheartedly that what they are standing up for is the right thing.
It is completely within your right to voice your concerns on this platform. However, rather than attacking Dr Lawrie for what she does, I would like to encourage you to take a step back and reflect on the question why medical regulators and governments are so keen on interfering with clinical practice-decisions of doctors, who wish to treat their covid patients with an FDA approved drug that has been around for decades and that is safer than aspirin. As a doctor you should know that prescribing off-licence drugs is part and parcel of your professional practice and nothing new. You may also want to reflect on the question why billions of people are being coerced and often mandated to take an injection that has no long-term safety profile and has already killed and disabled more people than all vaccinations administered over several decades put together. If you are actually an advocate of these intensely harmful injections, while demanding more evidence for ivermectin's safety and efficacy, I wonder if you could come to an awareness of how absurd this stance is.
I already asked you two times to show us your datas and you are not doing it. Why? You are the one who should apologize to everyone here for you false accusations.
Is Alastair McAlpine your real name? Where are your credentials to be verified?
By the way, I much do they pay you to work as a troll? Are you getting paid each time you post?
It's not *harmful misinformation* if it works and /or causes no harm. It is beneficial information, as opposed to the curiously sadistic need to divert people away from a demonstrably efficacious therapeutic.
Dr. Tess Lawrie always provides her references and proof of any information she provides. You need to provide us with the studies to which you are referring. It is obvious to the world that you have a different agenda. Where are these studies that show Ivermectin does not work?
Will it change your mind? 2 major meta-analyses and a bunch of RCTs? Would you then accept it doesn’t work? (Dr Lawrie won’t; even though her meta-analysis is so flawed there’s a statement of concern from the publisher).
Steve Kirsch - New study shows ivermectin can reduce chance of death by 92%
¨A new large prospective observational study of 88,000 people shows ivermectin works; the greater the dose, the better it works.¨
Regular use of ivermectin as prophylaxis for COVID-19 led up to 92% reduction in COVID-19 mortality rate in a dose-response manner: results of a prospective observational study of a strictly controlled population of 88,012 subjects among 223,128 participants.¨Read More https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/new-study-shows-ivermectin-can-reduce
I am not vaccinated and have a good immune system. However, I have helped it by using Ivermectin as a prophylactic over the past 18 months. The first time, at Christmas, I took doses on the day before and the day I travelled on a 6 hour train journey to London Kings Cross. My journeys were crowded with people, places and, of course, Covid. I stayed for 10 days and had no side effects from Ivermectin ( I was closely watching for any) I returned healthily to Scotland. Similarly, at Easter, I repeated the trip to London and took the Ivermectin as a prophylactic. While I was away I was alerted every day to increasing numbers of fully vaccinated friends at home who were all sick with Covid or other respiratory viruses. In response to " How are you?' questions from people I began to respond honestly and say "I am very well. Of course I take Ivermectin before I travel"
Last week, I was invited to the Scottish Open ( Golf) at St Andrews. I took Ivermectin the day before and on the day itself. At the last minute my host (fully vaccinated and boosted) tested positive and couldn't go with us! Covid is rampant again in this area of Scotland. In response to vaccinated people saying "You are lucky not to have got it" I simply reply (very gently) . "Yes. I have a good immune system but I also take Ivermectin which is known to be very effective against Covid". I watch their reactions. - It's time for us all to speak out quietly about what we know. Then people can make their own decisions.
Tess, your comments are so wise, so inclusive, so willing to engage with others who may not share your views. I am ecouraged by your continued efforts to get ivermectin approved for use(s)! and thereby save many more lives. Let's all celebrate World Ivermectin Day. I had a Labour politician on my doorstep yesterday, wanting my vote - I gave her a BIRD flyer on IVM to take away and ponder. I'll be wearing my BIRD tee shirt on Saturday.
Day 3. Fever started Monday night. I began the whole FLCCC I-CARE: Early COVID Treatment protocol immediately. 36 hours of nausea, sleep and temps up to 38.6. Couldn't get a kit in until yesterday and sure enough tested positive. Now Thursday early evening and I feel fine again. Fever was gone this morning. 55, overweight (i've done a lot, but more work to go there), unvaccinated. I know it's only anecdotal, but I wouldn't want to be stuck without ivermectin for myself or loved ones.
Having read many of the personal accounts on how Ivermectin has worked magic for themselves and their loved ones, it does appear that the majority have no idea why Ivermectin is banned by the authorities.
Clue 1. Follow the Money. Clue 2 Greed. Clue 3 Population Control.
The vaccine is experimental and only approved for emergency use, EUA. To obtain EUA, there must be no other medication proven to work against the Covid virus.
There are a number of billionaires who could probably explain it in simpler terms.
Happy Ivermectin Day for all our Dr Tess followers.
I’m totally frustrated on this subject. How can we move forward? So many “ doctors & scientists “ from across the globe say it doesn’t work & then you have some saying it does, a minority who speak against the grain. People trying to import it or buy it are stopped by their Governments, in numerous countries. Over 6 million people dead & still there is no clear consensus on IVM by any medical authority. It’s impossible for most to access even if it does work. Meanwhile where I live in Australia people are waiting in ambulances over 5 hours even when they have a suspected heart attack because hospitals are full of Covid & other respiratory infections & staff are reduced due to “ isolating “ from C19. 70 people have died just in my area waiting for an ambulance that took hours to respond.
Totalitarianism is what's happening, and it's been happening. The "COV!D" crime just ramped it up and fast-forwarded it across the globe.
A quote from American Thomas Jefferson: "If people let government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who live under tyranny."
I understand that WEF that is controlling Biden is moving away from Covid and going straight into the climate agenda bc it will last a lot longer. I saw a CNN video of a man that works there - I had the impression that Controllers know they can’t stretch out the bs much longer. I hope they are all prosecuted soon.
They have to hold the line on that (that no treatment options exist) otherwise the vaccines can’t be EUA - at least that’s how it works in the United States
Thanks for comment, something I will look into. As for IVM when you have thousands of Drs saying it doesn’t work & a few saying it does then you don’t know who to trust. Let’s face it many Drs have been wrong in the past & most just rely on blanket advice from a pamphlet email rather than seeking the information out to comprehend it, almost like a factory line. At this stage in the game you would hope a bigger focus on treating people would be a the fore given the poor results of the vaccines
To my knowledge there are no prospective treatment studies of vaccine injuries yet, however there is a growing body of anecdotal evidence from doctors that ivm is helping their vaccine injured patients - this is why FLCCC and others have included it in their guidance. We hope to start a study soon to help answer this question in collaboration with ukcvfamily.org. At least one of the mechanism of injuries associated with these injections relates to the overproduction of the Covid spike protein so it makes sense that ivm may help. Also, as ivm has anti-inflammatory properties and these genetic vaccines cause multisystem inflammation, ivm may help to ameliorate symptoms. Currently it is not known if injuries can be cured. Because ivm is one of the safest medicines around and post COVID vaccine syndrome is a new disease that has not been studied, it seems reasonable to give ivm a try. Doing so in the context of a study is a sensible approach so that data can be gathered that may help answer this question.
Happy Ivermectin Day! Holderlin said "Where there is danger, that which will save us also grows" Today is also the day Henry David Thoreau refused to pay his one dollar poll tax to protest slavery and
US involvement in the Mexican war and was put in jail. This lead him to write his essay "On Civil Disobediance." There is a no doubt apocryphal story that Ralph Waldo Emerson, a fellow Transcendentalist and writer, came to see him in jail and said "what are you doing in there Henry?" to which Thoreau is said to have replied "What are you doing OUT THERE Ralph?"
BTW in Australia we are unable to obtain Ivermectin for human use. As a farmer we feel our cows are very lucky to have regular Ivermectin (a pour on) ! The odd bit on our hands doesn’t do any harm either!!!
Tess, one of my readers was telling me about the seven principles presented at the Better Way Conference. She very graciously shared her notes with me, but I was wondering if you have these posted on the WCH website anywhere (she looked but couldn’t find them) as I would love to link to them in a future article. Thanks, Tess!
Happy World Ivermectin Day in advance to you, Tess, and everyone else here!
For those who missed my case study on the ivermectin disinformation campaign from last fall, here it is in honor of World Ivermectin Day:
• “Letter to a Scientifically-Minded Friend” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/letter-to-a-scientifically-minded)
How does Ivermectin actually work against COVID-19?
Ivermectin is an amazing multi-tasker, helping to prevent and reduce the severity of Covid-19 infection in several different ways
1 - Ivermectin stops SARS-CoV-2 from entering the cells
2 - Ivermectin may stop viral proteins from travelling in and out of the cell nucleus
3 - It prevents viral replication and assembly
4 - It reduces inflammation
5 - It Prevents Clotting
6 - It helps protect the heart
7 - It may help to re-populate the microbiome
Read More https://worldivermectinday.org/
It does none of these things to any clinical significance.
The data form multiple RCTs is clear: ivermectin does not work against Covid-19.
Please stop spreading harmful misinformation.
No you stop, NWO shill.
I receive no funding from anyone except my employer (public funds).
Never have, never will.
Now the really interesting question is:
Can Dr Lawrie say the same?
Why do you think Dr Laurie receives funds to push IVM ? I am not convinced either way that it works or doesn’t work but to suggest she gets money to push this medication is silly given that it’s not a high price product.
I’m just asking. Who funds the WCH? Has Dr Lawrie accepted any funds from antivaccine or other organizations? If so, who?
These are reasonable questions in light of her sudden pivot away from science and towards pseudoscience.
Hello Alastair, we are funded entirely by public donation. All money that comes through this Substack also goes directly towards WCH work. I welcome constructive and respectful discussion and value the opinion of others, though it must be acknowledged that truth has been particularly elusive during the Covid crisis. If you would like to indicate which reviews you are referencing I would be happy to explain their limitations.
Thank you, Dr Lawrie: have any of your donations come from antivaccine organizations or anti-vaccine advocates (like Robert F Kennedy, Steve Kirsch etc)?
Why have you not withdrawn your meta-analysis, given the terribly weak and fraudulent studies you included (Elgazzar, Niaee, Petkov, Okumus, Hashim)?
When analysis is done without these studies, and including TOGETHER and I-Tech, there is no benefit.
I know this won’t change your mind, but I am interested in how a previously respected researcher disappeared down such a dark rabbit hole. Was it worth throwing away all professional credibility?
Mr McAlpine, you claim that ivermectin shows no benefit when the named 'flawed' studies are excluded and TOGETHER and I-Tech are included. Firstly, are you aware that the TOGETHER study itself is filled with flaws? If not, please educate yourself: https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/news/together-trial.
Please provide evidence, i.e. a systematic review/meta-analysis, which I am sure you have access to.
Secondly, if you demand that Dr Lawrie and her team retract their meta-analysis based on the inclusion of studies that have been described as 'flawed', I suggest you demand the same of the Popp et al. study: https://c19ivermectin.com/popp.html - amongst many others. In fact, you may want to demand the same of around 80% of all studies that have been commissioned by the pharmaceutical industry.
Thirdly, the term "anti-vaccine" is a weaponised term to denigrate individuals who have perfectly valid concerns about the safety of a medical intervention. If you look into what these people and organisations are calling for, you will find that all they demand is to properly safety-test these interventions before having them injected into the arms of infants. No more no less! After the disastrous handling of this covid crisis, it is no wonder that people have grown more sceptical of vaccinations in general.
More importantly, you are alluding that Dr Lawrie is compromised by financial interests. As a matter of fact, since becoming an advocate for early treatment and a critic of the covid injections, she has been taking a massive pay-cut and has to deal with public smear-campaigns against herself and her work. The same applies to fellow warriors, like Dr Kory or Prof Marik. Nobody puts themselves in this position, if they did not believe wholeheartedly that what they are standing up for is the right thing.
It is completely within your right to voice your concerns on this platform. However, rather than attacking Dr Lawrie for what she does, I would like to encourage you to take a step back and reflect on the question why medical regulators and governments are so keen on interfering with clinical practice-decisions of doctors, who wish to treat their covid patients with an FDA approved drug that has been around for decades and that is safer than aspirin. As a doctor you should know that prescribing off-licence drugs is part and parcel of your professional practice and nothing new. You may also want to reflect on the question why billions of people are being coerced and often mandated to take an injection that has no long-term safety profile and has already killed and disabled more people than all vaccinations administered over several decades put together. If you are actually an advocate of these intensely harmful injections, while demanding more evidence for ivermectin's safety and efficacy, I wonder if you could come to an awareness of how absurd this stance is.
When Utter Pradesh I think it was removed their chief medical officer due to suspicions she was being funded or influenced by big pharma in some way due to her intransegence in banning the use of Ivermectin and they then started using Ivermectin, but for some reason were not permitted by the WHO to say they were using Ivermectin, the numbers of people ill with Covid collapsed in that area containing hundreds of millions of people. Why did the collapse in Covid numbers happen never to return and why did the WHO prevent the Utter Pradesh government from saying what was in their free 5 day packs they handed out to everyone? And if I can say on a personal note if you aren't anti-vaccine after years in the medical profession then you have ignored your duty to frst do no harm.
Who funds you??
I already answered this. Please keep up.
Nobody sponsors me. I am a public salaried physician and I have never received a cent from Big Pharma.
Now… Dr Lawrie’s turn.
Yet you are exerting considerable effort to dissuade others from availing themselves from a provably efficacious therapeutic. It's almost as if there is envy as your motivation.
Steve Kirsch - New study shows ivermectin can reduce chance of death by 92%
¨A new large prospective observational study of 88,000 people shows ivermectin works; the greater the dose, the better it works.¨
Regular use of ivermectin as prophylaxis for COVID-19 led up to 92% reduction in COVID-19 mortality rate in a dose-response manner: results of a prospective observational study of a strictly controlled population of 88,012 subjects among 223,128 participants.¨Read More https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/new-study-shows-ivermectin-can-reduce
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361903713_Regular_use_of_ivermectin_as_prophylaxis_for_COVID-19_led_up_to_92_reduction_in_COVID-19_mortality_rate_in_a_dose-response_manner_results_of_a_prospective_observational_study_of_a_strictly_controlled_
I don't believe you. Proof?
So big pharma is considered "public" now?
Alastair McAlpine - Who are you?
Someone who hates seeing science twisted and misrepresented by (non-practicing) physicians like Dr Lawrie.
It doesn’t work. The evidence is clear.
To be blunt, you are lying. The dozens of studies available are proof of that. Stop. Be productive, not destructive.
Unfortunately for you, this is literally my job. And I am well-acquainted with the literature on this subject.
Lawrie’s meta-analysis is unreliable because it included studies that are either fraudulent (Elgazzar), non-randomized (Hashim, Okumus, Niaee), not published (Petkov) or extremely weak.
It’s why there’s an expression of concern from the publisher; often a prelude to retraction.
When we look at the larger, well-conducted RCTs (I-TECH, TOGETHER), we see no benefit. And when meta-analysis is done excluding the very weak studies (Cochrane), there is no evidence of benefit.
I would ask you to apologize for your insult, but I suspect you will not. True believers rarely do. All I can hope is that you realize that the science on ivermectin is clear: it doesn’t work. False accusations against physicians who actually see patients (unlike Dr Lawrie) won’t change that.
Mr McAlpine, you claim that ivermectin shows no benefit when the named 'flawed' studies are excluded and TOGETHER and I-Tech are included. Firstly, are you aware that the TOGETHER study itself is filled with flaws? If not, please educate yourself: https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/news/together-trial.
Please provide evidence, i.e. a systematic review/meta-analysis, which I am sure you have access to.
Secondly, if you demand that Dr Lawrie and her team retract their meta-analysis based on the inclusion of studies that have been described as 'flawed', I suggest you demand the same of the Popp et al. study: https://c19ivermectin.com/popp.html - amongst many others. In fact, you may want to demand the same of around 80% of all studies that have been commissioned by the pharmaceutical industry.
Thirdly, the term "anti-vaccine" is a weaponised term to denigrate individuals who have perfectly valid concerns about the safety of a medical intervention. If you look into what these people and organisations are calling for, you will find that all they demand is to properly safety-test these interventions before having them injected into the arms of infants. No more no less! After the disastrous handling of this covid crisis, it is no wonder that people have grown more sceptical of vaccinations in general.
More importantly, you are alluding that Dr Lawrie is compromised by financial interests. As a matter of fact, since becoming an advocate for early treatment and a critic of the covid injections, she has been taking a massive pay-cut and has to deal with public smear-campaigns against herself and her work. The same applies to fellow warriors, like Dr Kory or Prof Marik. Nobody puts themselves in this position, if they did not believe wholeheartedly that what they are standing up for is the right thing.
It is completely within your right to voice your concerns on this platform. However, rather than attacking Dr Lawrie for what she does, I would like to encourage you to take a step back and reflect on the question why medical regulators and governments are so keen on interfering with clinical practice-decisions of doctors, who wish to treat their covid patients with an FDA approved drug that has been around for decades and that is safer than aspirin. As a doctor you should know that prescribing off-licence drugs is part and parcel of your professional practice and nothing new. You may also want to reflect on the question why billions of people are being coerced and often mandated to take an injection that has no long-term safety profile and has already killed and disabled more people than all vaccinations administered over several decades put together. If you are actually an advocate of these intensely harmful injections, while demanding more evidence for ivermectin's safety and efficacy, I wonder if you could come to an awareness of how absurd this stance is.
Well said Linda FM!!
I already asked you two times to show us your datas and you are not doing it. Why? You are the one who should apologize to everyone here for you false accusations.
Is Alastair McAlpine your real name? Where are your credentials to be verified?
By the way, I much do they pay you to work as a troll? Are you getting paid each time you post?
I don’t waste time with nobodies who play the shill card.
Go elsewhere.
Troll!
Evidence?
It's not *harmful misinformation* if it works and /or causes no harm. It is beneficial information, as opposed to the curiously sadistic need to divert people away from a demonstrably efficacious therapeutic.
Well said Tori!!
Dr. Tess Lawrie always provides her references and proof of any information she provides. You need to provide us with the studies to which you are referring. It is obvious to the world that you have a different agenda. Where are these studies that show Ivermectin does not work?
Alastair McAlpine - Could you show us your data?
Will it change your mind? 2 major meta-analyses and a bunch of RCTs? Would you then accept it doesn’t work? (Dr Lawrie won’t; even though her meta-analysis is so flawed there’s a statement of concern from the publisher).
Steve Kirsch - New study shows ivermectin can reduce chance of death by 92%
¨A new large prospective observational study of 88,000 people shows ivermectin works; the greater the dose, the better it works.¨
Regular use of ivermectin as prophylaxis for COVID-19 led up to 92% reduction in COVID-19 mortality rate in a dose-response manner: results of a prospective observational study of a strictly controlled population of 88,012 subjects among 223,128 participants.¨Read More https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/new-study-shows-ivermectin-can-reduce
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361903713_Regular_use_of_ivermectin_as_prophylaxis_for_COVID-19_led_up_to_92_reduction_in_COVID-19_mortality_rate_in_a_dose-response_manner_results_of_a_prospective_observational_study_of_a_strictly_controlled_
I already ask you. Show us your data, your ¨2 major meta-analyses and a bunch of RCTs¨
Alastair McAlpine - Take your Blue Pill and go back to your Blissful Sleep!
I am not vaccinated and have a good immune system. However, I have helped it by using Ivermectin as a prophylactic over the past 18 months. The first time, at Christmas, I took doses on the day before and the day I travelled on a 6 hour train journey to London Kings Cross. My journeys were crowded with people, places and, of course, Covid. I stayed for 10 days and had no side effects from Ivermectin ( I was closely watching for any) I returned healthily to Scotland. Similarly, at Easter, I repeated the trip to London and took the Ivermectin as a prophylactic. While I was away I was alerted every day to increasing numbers of fully vaccinated friends at home who were all sick with Covid or other respiratory viruses. In response to " How are you?' questions from people I began to respond honestly and say "I am very well. Of course I take Ivermectin before I travel"
Last week, I was invited to the Scottish Open ( Golf) at St Andrews. I took Ivermectin the day before and on the day itself. At the last minute my host (fully vaccinated and boosted) tested positive and couldn't go with us! Covid is rampant again in this area of Scotland. In response to vaccinated people saying "You are lucky not to have got it" I simply reply (very gently) . "Yes. I have a good immune system but I also take Ivermectin which is known to be very effective against Covid". I watch their reactions. - It's time for us all to speak out quietly about what we know. Then people can make their own decisions.
Tess, your comments are so wise, so inclusive, so willing to engage with others who may not share your views. I am ecouraged by your continued efforts to get ivermectin approved for use(s)! and thereby save many more lives. Let's all celebrate World Ivermectin Day. I had a Labour politician on my doorstep yesterday, wanting my vote - I gave her a BIRD flyer on IVM to take away and ponder. I'll be wearing my BIRD tee shirt on Saturday.
Day 3. Fever started Monday night. I began the whole FLCCC I-CARE: Early COVID Treatment protocol immediately. 36 hours of nausea, sleep and temps up to 38.6. Couldn't get a kit in until yesterday and sure enough tested positive. Now Thursday early evening and I feel fine again. Fever was gone this morning. 55, overweight (i've done a lot, but more work to go there), unvaccinated. I know it's only anecdotal, but I wouldn't want to be stuck without ivermectin for myself or loved ones.
How wounderful that the Ivermektin Day is the some day as my birthday🤩🥰❤️
You are a powerful woman Tess and I hope the world will wake up so that you and all your fellow fighters will be heard❤️
Thank you for beeing YOU❤️
(Sorry for my bad English)
Happy birthday! Your English is very good.
🙏❤️🙏
"Happy Birthday to you, Happy Birthday to you..." If you think your English is bad, be profoundly grateful that you can't hear my singing voice! :-)
🙏🥰🙏
Having read many of the personal accounts on how Ivermectin has worked magic for themselves and their loved ones, it does appear that the majority have no idea why Ivermectin is banned by the authorities.
Clue 1. Follow the Money. Clue 2 Greed. Clue 3 Population Control.
The vaccine is experimental and only approved for emergency use, EUA. To obtain EUA, there must be no other medication proven to work against the Covid virus.
There are a number of billionaires who could probably explain it in simpler terms.
Happy Ivermectin Day for all our Dr Tess followers.
I’m totally frustrated on this subject. How can we move forward? So many “ doctors & scientists “ from across the globe say it doesn’t work & then you have some saying it does, a minority who speak against the grain. People trying to import it or buy it are stopped by their Governments, in numerous countries. Over 6 million people dead & still there is no clear consensus on IVM by any medical authority. It’s impossible for most to access even if it does work. Meanwhile where I live in Australia people are waiting in ambulances over 5 hours even when they have a suspected heart attack because hospitals are full of Covid & other respiratory infections & staff are reduced due to “ isolating “ from C19. 70 people have died just in my area waiting for an ambulance that took hours to respond.
WTF is happening ?
Totalitarianism is what's happening, and it's been happening. The "COV!D" crime just ramped it up and fast-forwarded it across the globe.
A quote from American Thomas Jefferson: "If people let government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who live under tyranny."
No truer words...
Yes, we had wise ancestors. Now we must devise ways of moving forward as humans free if the chains which bound us during this go round.
It was never about health, it's all about control.
I understand that WEF that is controlling Biden is moving away from Covid and going straight into the climate agenda bc it will last a lot longer. I saw a CNN video of a man that works there - I had the impression that Controllers know they can’t stretch out the bs much longer. I hope they are all prosecuted soon.
Me too. But we may need to hang in for the long haul, so many don't see it.
And as obvious as the nose on our faces.
Indeed. 
Pretty weird for such a highly vaccinated country, right?
I was expecting it, but not at this level & the fact that ANY “ treatment” is not now considered as a first line option is beyond all rational.
They have to hold the line on that (that no treatment options exist) otherwise the vaccines can’t be EUA - at least that’s how it works in the United States
Thanks for comment, something I will look into. As for IVM when you have thousands of Drs saying it doesn’t work & a few saying it does then you don’t know who to trust. Let’s face it many Drs have been wrong in the past & most just rely on blanket advice from a pamphlet email rather than seeking the information out to comprehend it, almost like a factory line. At this stage in the game you would hope a bigger focus on treating people would be a the fore given the poor results of the vaccines
I hope and trust you are right. We have put our money where our beliefs have been !
To be honest, we also backed our own immune system and the percentage survival chance-even at my age (70+)
So happy World Ivermectin day.
Thanks Tess.
Is there any evidence that Ivermectin can help vaccine damaged people?
To my knowledge there are no prospective treatment studies of vaccine injuries yet, however there is a growing body of anecdotal evidence from doctors that ivm is helping their vaccine injured patients - this is why FLCCC and others have included it in their guidance. We hope to start a study soon to help answer this question in collaboration with ukcvfamily.org. At least one of the mechanism of injuries associated with these injections relates to the overproduction of the Covid spike protein so it makes sense that ivm may help. Also, as ivm has anti-inflammatory properties and these genetic vaccines cause multisystem inflammation, ivm may help to ameliorate symptoms. Currently it is not known if injuries can be cured. Because ivm is one of the safest medicines around and post COVID vaccine syndrome is a new disease that has not been studied, it seems reasonable to give ivm a try. Doing so in the context of a study is a sensible approach so that data can be gathered that may help answer this question.
Happy Ivermectin Day! Holderlin said "Where there is danger, that which will save us also grows" Today is also the day Henry David Thoreau refused to pay his one dollar poll tax to protest slavery and
US involvement in the Mexican war and was put in jail. This lead him to write his essay "On Civil Disobediance." There is a no doubt apocryphal story that Ralph Waldo Emerson, a fellow Transcendentalist and writer, came to see him in jail and said "what are you doing in there Henry?" to which Thoreau is said to have replied "What are you doing OUT THERE Ralph?"
Mother Nature wins out over big Pharma any day. And she freely gives us abundance of all things.
Succinct.
Concise.
The perfect 7 words.
BTW in Australia we are unable to obtain Ivermectin for human use. As a farmer we feel our cows are very lucky to have regular Ivermectin (a pour on) ! The odd bit on our hands doesn’t do any harm either!!!
Tess, one of my readers was telling me about the seven principles presented at the Better Way Conference. She very graciously shared her notes with me, but I was wondering if you have these posted on the WCH website anywhere (she looked but couldn’t find them) as I would love to link to them in a future article. Thanks, Tess!
Margaret https://worldivermectinday.org/
Thanks, Mario! I’m referring to the seven principles outlined at the Better Way Conference, the first one being:
1. We all act in honor and do not harm—to others or ourselves.
Ok. Sorry:)
No prob!
I am glad you asked, Margaret - they are being published next week!
15 February 2017 The Journal of Antibiotics
Ivermectin: enigmatic multifaceted ‘wonder’ drug continues to surprise and exceed expectations
[fully expands on the knowledge of the clinical uses and it is assumed, ongoing scientific Ivermectin exploration, in spite of denigration]