A shocking (but hopeful!) discovery
If those controlling the World Health Organization (WHO) get their way, the United Kingdom and other Member States will soon be subject to medical and political tyranny under amendments to the International Health Regulations 2005 (IHR), and the so-called ‘Pandemic Treaty’. To date, citizen efforts to oppose these developments have been ignored. But suddenly it appears that there is hope!
New research has revealed that the UK is unlawfully part of WHO! Based on this discovery, a group known as The People’s Lawyers are launching a legal action for an Injunction to reject the IHR and proposed amendments, any ‘Pandemic Treaty’, and all dictates from WHO, both now and in the future. They are also seeking to halt UK Government funding of WHO and related organisations, and to have the UK exit WHO on the basis that its Membership has been unlawful from the start.
How did this situation arise?
The fundamental concern is that significant fraud was committed during the establishment of WHO. Documents, including diary entries, prove that the ‘official story’ is a highly sanitised version of the actual events. You can read the details of the whole intriguing story here, but for a quick overview, here are the essential points that illustrate the fraudulent nature of WHO’s origins, and give hope that this may aid the UK’s withdrawal.
The official story states that, “In April 1945, during the Conference to set up the United Nations (UN) held in San Francisco, representatives of Brazil and China proposed that an international health organization be established and a conference to frame its constitution convened.”
In fact, this was not a spontaneous proposal from two nations; instead, the two doctors who brought the proposal, Dr Souza from Brazil and Dr Sze, a Chinese American, worked together at the United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Administration (UNRRA) in Washington DC and were collaborating with the US Government and the Rockefeller Foundation (RF) to engineer WHO’s establishment. Dr Sze wrote the documents claimed to be from the Chinese and Brazilian governments regarding ‘their’ desires for an international health organisation, and both doctors worked hard to convince the Brazilian and Chinese delegates to cooperate.Dr Sze also drafted a resolution from the San Francisco Conference and took this to Washington DC, where Rockefeller-influenced officials approved it as a Health Interim Commission. This mechanism (first used to create the Food and Agriculture Organization in 1943) allowed an organisation to be set up exactly as required. People who had not been involved in the ‘expert’ proceedings were unable to change things later. Thus WHO was set up by stealth, without notification or participation of potential Member States.
The role of the Rockefeller Foundation, which has quietly steered the global public health agenda for over a century, cannot be underestimated. Since it was founded in 1913 it has been a major funder of public health research, policy, implementation, and education around the world. While it is a philanthropic body, this level of investment garners a great deal of geopolitical power and influence. Indeed, the progenitor of WHO – the League of Nations Health Organisation (LNHO), founded after World War 1 – was modelled on the RF’s own International Health Division (est. 1927), and the RF was its major patron.
The UN Economic and Social Council (ESC) called for an International Health Conference in New York (19 June – 22 July 1946) to establish WHO. This proved to be a rubber-stamping exercise as, prior to the conference, the WHO Technical Preparatory Committee (comprising members with links to the RF, including Souza and Sze, as well as US government representatives) had finalised the proposed WHO Constitution.
This Constitution was essentially forced on the delegates. They assumed that it would be properly considered and ratified, and that it could be rejected by their own governments, but this did not happen. In the UK there was no attempt to review or ratify the document. On 22 July 1946 it was signed by representatives of 61 nations. While this would seem to be the date of the establishment of WHO, the Constitution only came into force in 1948, after 26 nations had ratified it. The Interim Commission remained in force for two more years, until it was succeeded by WHO on 31 August 1948.
Mystery surrounds the involvement of the UK in the establishment of WHO. The official Parliamentary record, Hansard, makes no mention during May 1946 of the UK signing up to a ‘World Health Organization’ shortly after the UN ESC meeting in New York. While the official UN attendance list states that the Minister in charge of the UK delegation was Hector McNeil, Hansard records him speaking in Parliament on the same day – so he could not have been present in New York. Very few MPs – not even the Health Minister – knew about the International Health Conference or the signing of the WHO Constitution. It is highly irregular that the UK was not required to ratify its membership and that Cabinet neither discussed nor agreed to this international agreement.
At the end of the International Health Conference, the WHO Constitution was signed by two ‘government advisors’ – Dr McKenzie and Mr Yates – on behalf of the UK. No UK Minister was present and the UK’s Chief Medical Officer, Sir Wilson Jameson, who attended the Conference was not a signatory. It is unconscionable that such an important agreement could have been signed without Parliament even being aware of the process, and without any senior members of the Government being present. There are even questions as to the legality of the original signed Constitution as many of the signatures were just squiggles, and the printed names and positions of the signatories, which are required on a legally binding document, were missing.
One of the reasons for the establishment of WHO was to take over the functions of UNRRA, a body with a limited life span but massive public health powers. In 1944 it had imposed International Sanitary Conventions on the entire world and had the power to mandate vaccination of anyone they chose.
Another organisation that was incorporated into WHO in 1946 was the LNHO. With all its staff being transferred to WHO, the new organisation incorporated much of LNHO’s sinister past, including a history of Nazi and fascist collaboration during World War 2, promotion of eugenics (population control and sterilisation) in its policies, and control by Rockefeller and Big Pharma interests.
Time for legal action
WHO’s current desperate power grab clearly has a long history. Even before the signing of WHO’s Constitution in 1946, its progenitor organisations were already using public health as a means of expanding global control. The UK’s People and Parliament were bypassed and deceived when WHO was created, and have continued to be deceived by the unlawful nature of the UK’s membership of WHO for the past 77 years. But now this immense fraud has been exposed and the legal challenge must follow.
Considering the above, The People’s Lawyers assert that:
The UK was unlawfully signed up to the WHO Constitution. It is therefore not legitimately a WHO Member State and should not be subject to the International Health Regulations 2005, their recent amendments, or any ‘Pandemic Treaty’.
The UK should not be subject to any dictates from WHO, nor should it have to
make any further financial contributions to WHO or any associated organisations.Past contributions to WHO should now be refunded, as WHO knowingly allowed unelected advisors to unlawfully sign the Constitution, and this without ratification.
Recognising the depth of the fraud, other alleged WHO ‘Member States’ should now also examine how they ended up as part of WHO, without a referendum or even, in some cases, ratification. It is time for the People to hold WHO to account. Thanks to The People’s Lawyers, there is now evidence we can use to dismantle this discredited organisation.
BEFORE YOU GO … YOU CAN TAKE ACTION!
Sign the Petition to End the UK’s membership of the World Health Organization!
Pledge to help to support The People’s Lawyers in their case to Reject and Exit the WHO!
Value exchange
If you find value in these articles and podcasts, please consider becoming a paid subscriber. All proceeds go towards the humanitarian work of the World Council for Health.
The corruption runs very deep !
I 🙏 the power of people collectively swings in our favour.
Thank you for everything you do xx
For me, it stands to reason. Nobody I have spoken to has agreed to be controlled by foreign powers like the WHO, WEF etc. And I can't remember it ever being on any political party's manifesto coming up to election time, so therefore they did not have the blessing of the people of the UK.
If we go to our GP, he can only give us advice, and that is because we have free will. which is not given by government, and providing we do no harm, each of us is sovereign as we were born free and nobody can take that freedom unless we are a danger to others.
I have heard that government serves the people and also that the Crown also serves the people.
Telling us what is going to be, is control and unlawful from what I understand. And now we are seeing how government is committing harms, and again using powerful and stealthy psi-ops that are openly explained on their own webpages in a documents entitled MINDSPACE where it is explained how they go about changing peoples' views using without them even realizing it.. 'uniformed' consent?? Isn't that in itself a crime against the people of their own country? And in this case are they not conspiring with foreign powers for even more tyranny and control?
They don't give us rights, we are born with them...
We are also entitled to free speech, but they have ridden roughshod over that right too. Many of the worlds greatest minds, have been silenced and only the voices of those in the pockets of the world's tyrants have had access the Main Stream Media.
I feel strongly that my health is my own business, and that of my doctors should I choose to consult with him/her.
I have signed the petition to end our membership, but I have no intention of complying with anything that I consider to be experimental or dangerous. anyway, not matter how 'safe and effective' these lunatics claim them to be. I believe the whole pandemic was at best, not near as serious as the party-going, rule-breaking government were claiming, but having worked as a psychotherapist for 45+ years but now retired, back in 2020, the propaganda and silencing of competent experts showed me to my amazement (and horror) that it was all more than likely a giant hoax and a crime to humanity.
Thank you for all your do Dr Tess... I wish your team every success in this court case, and will hold it in my minds eye.