Aug 19·edited Aug 19Liked by Tess Lawrie, MBBCh, PhD
Thank you for covering this. I had read what Tim Truth had to say and what Dr Yeadon said on The Delingpod and my first thoughts were 'I will wait until I hear what Dr Lawrie has to say before I think further about this'. Also I really hope Mike Yeadon will discuss this with you in a public forum.
heidi heil has also been taken aback by the vociferous attack on ivermectin by yeadon et al. you may find her arguments interesting. she doesn't look at the science(tm) of ivermectin's direct effect on fertility. instead she looks at the indirect effect by how effectively ivermectin treats filiaris and hookworm infections, both of which have huge negative effects on fertility. so, by effectively treating these infections/diseases ivermectin is a significant net positive on fertility, even if the falsified science(tm) on ivermectin was true.
"Yeadon Fear Porn and Finger Pointing: Will it ever end?"
I think the discussion about IVM is great! Not because Mike Y. Is right or wrong. Because it brings up the issue of Ivermectin in greater detail. And you can’t talk about IVM without talking about covid, cancer, and parasites, which I believe is the last thing Big Pharma wants.
Let the Ivermectin Olympics begin. Spotlights are great disinfectants.
Several points:
1. "why are all the doctors who use ivermectin being censored and losing their licences?" Very simply, Control. This was never a pandemic. This was a mass mind control psyop setting up the next one (Disease X?). To get the critical's Doctors' groups to go along there were huge incentives and huge penalties. The goal is to turn both the people and their medical Shepards into scared sheep. It worked. The Doctors punished were not solely punished for pushing Ivermectin. The (few) Doctors who pushed IVM were punished because they went off the reservation and that was the cardinal sin. No dissent allowed, even if partially beneficial to the Overloads. The goal was compliance. First, last, always.
2. If the Overlords allowed IVM to be declared an effective Covid treatment, that creates legal issues for Big Pharma getting EUAs. Protecting and strongly reinforcing the power of Big Pharma and the Medical Mafia was also a major goal of the scandemic. Looking at the joke that was booster testing (8 mice, my God) shows that this was all about protection of the mRNA technology, no matter how deadly it is now and in the future. Effective early treatments could not be allowed because they could create legal problems for the Prime Objective. MRNA in every arm, every year and no early treatments. Unless it's RunDeathIsNear.
3. I haven't done enough work to have a strong opinion yet on whether IVM is as impactful on fertility as MY states. (Interesting that there is no “definitive” study on this after all the IVM pills that have beed popped). Since there is a huge Pharma initiative to support supplying IVM to poor people and there have been numerous (Gates and UN) "health programs" that mysteriously had other ingredients that were highly suspicious of being birth control drugs, pushing IVM for River Blindness (like over-breeding peasants get) with the added benefit of population control seems entirely reasonable to me.
4. Keeping Western Medicine ignorant about parasites and what their true roll in health is critical to Big Pharma's plans. If parasites are actually the cause of lots of diseases that are easily and cheaply treated, the foundations of Rockefeller medicines may collapse. IVM puts a spot light on parasites, which can't be allowed. Particularly if the spot light shines on IVM and the Golden Goose of medical treatments, chemotherapy. That alone is enough to censor IVM and anyone associated with it. As one who has stomped around some of the world's hellholes and taken anti-parasitical drugs, parasites are a big deal around the world. Except in Rockefeller medicine controlled countries. (FYI - if you have a pet, 90% chance you and your family have parasites. Ever been asked if you have a pet by your Doctor? There's a reason.)
Maybe MY is wrong on this. Let's see. He has been right on a lot when even Medical Freedom Doctors have been terribly wrong, or silent. He's earned a few credibility hero points. LIKE TESS.
So happy you addressed it here today Dr Tess and happy to read comments so far and agree, a further discussion on the matter seems like the likely thing to happen!
Thank you for covering this. I had read what Tim Truth had to say and what Dr Yeadon said on The Delingpod and my first thoughts were 'I will wait until I hear what Dr Lawrie has to say before I think further about this'. Also I really hope Mike Yeadon will discuss this with you in a public forum.
hola tess.
heidi heil has also been taken aback by the vociferous attack on ivermectin by yeadon et al. you may find her arguments interesting. she doesn't look at the science(tm) of ivermectin's direct effect on fertility. instead she looks at the indirect effect by how effectively ivermectin treats filiaris and hookworm infections, both of which have huge negative effects on fertility. so, by effectively treating these infections/diseases ivermectin is a significant net positive on fertility, even if the falsified science(tm) on ivermectin was true.
"Yeadon Fear Porn and Finger Pointing: Will it ever end?"
https://thymuscures.substack.com/p/yeadon-fear-porn-and-finger-pointing
(her interesting research includes a range of discussion on natural foods/supplements and their effects on fertility.)
all the best with what is changing. everything changes!
I think the discussion about IVM is great! Not because Mike Y. Is right or wrong. Because it brings up the issue of Ivermectin in greater detail. And you can’t talk about IVM without talking about covid, cancer, and parasites, which I believe is the last thing Big Pharma wants.
Let the Ivermectin Olympics begin. Spotlights are great disinfectants.
Several points:
1. "why are all the doctors who use ivermectin being censored and losing their licences?" Very simply, Control. This was never a pandemic. This was a mass mind control psyop setting up the next one (Disease X?). To get the critical's Doctors' groups to go along there were huge incentives and huge penalties. The goal is to turn both the people and their medical Shepards into scared sheep. It worked. The Doctors punished were not solely punished for pushing Ivermectin. The (few) Doctors who pushed IVM were punished because they went off the reservation and that was the cardinal sin. No dissent allowed, even if partially beneficial to the Overloads. The goal was compliance. First, last, always.
2. If the Overlords allowed IVM to be declared an effective Covid treatment, that creates legal issues for Big Pharma getting EUAs. Protecting and strongly reinforcing the power of Big Pharma and the Medical Mafia was also a major goal of the scandemic. Looking at the joke that was booster testing (8 mice, my God) shows that this was all about protection of the mRNA technology, no matter how deadly it is now and in the future. Effective early treatments could not be allowed because they could create legal problems for the Prime Objective. MRNA in every arm, every year and no early treatments. Unless it's RunDeathIsNear.
3. I haven't done enough work to have a strong opinion yet on whether IVM is as impactful on fertility as MY states. (Interesting that there is no “definitive” study on this after all the IVM pills that have beed popped). Since there is a huge Pharma initiative to support supplying IVM to poor people and there have been numerous (Gates and UN) "health programs" that mysteriously had other ingredients that were highly suspicious of being birth control drugs, pushing IVM for River Blindness (like over-breeding peasants get) with the added benefit of population control seems entirely reasonable to me.
4. Keeping Western Medicine ignorant about parasites and what their true roll in health is critical to Big Pharma's plans. If parasites are actually the cause of lots of diseases that are easily and cheaply treated, the foundations of Rockefeller medicines may collapse. IVM puts a spot light on parasites, which can't be allowed. Particularly if the spot light shines on IVM and the Golden Goose of medical treatments, chemotherapy. That alone is enough to censor IVM and anyone associated with it. As one who has stomped around some of the world's hellholes and taken anti-parasitical drugs, parasites are a big deal around the world. Except in Rockefeller medicine controlled countries. (FYI - if you have a pet, 90% chance you and your family have parasites. Ever been asked if you have a pet by your Doctor? There's a reason.)
Maybe MY is wrong on this. Let's see. He has been right on a lot when even Medical Freedom Doctors have been terribly wrong, or silent. He's earned a few credibility hero points. LIKE TESS.
I look forward to the public discussion! Thank you, Dr. Lawrie.
So happy you addressed it here today Dr Tess and happy to read comments so far and agree, a further discussion on the matter seems like the likely thing to happen!
Just a quick note. Due to double-posting, there are readers' comments in the earlier post here: https://drtesslawrie.substack.com/p/is-ivermectin-really-a-genocidal?publication_id=773468
IVERMECTIN TESTIMONIAL from UK Aug.26, 2024
Dr. William Makis MD Aug 27, 2024
Ivermectin Success!
https://makismd.substack.com/p/ivermectin-testimonial-from-uk-aug26