Professor Dalgleish is a gem for sure. My daughter was recently diagnosed (it was initially missed) with metastatic breast cancer. Professor Dalgleish offered a Teams Meeting with her to discuss an off licence drug some of his patients were on when I enquired about it. Currently she is having integrated treatment in Germany with Dr Vogl at the Frankfurt University Hospital directed there by Cancer Options who also admire Professor Dalgleish's ability to think outside the box. Fortunately none of us have been vaccinated.
Dec 4, 2022·edited Dec 7, 2022Liked by Dr Tess Lawrie, MBBCh, PhD
~29 min mark:To my knowledge nobody has examined data regarding increased infectivity/positive test results in the week or 2 weeks after the initial shot. Those people with just one shot were always considered to be unvaccinated. That data really should have been parsed out. It's possible that this virus never would have spread in the way that it did without the shot.
We know that the shot did not prevent transmission, but it is very possible that it played a key role in actually increasing the rate of spread.
One critical difference between all previous vaccines and the mRNA "vaccines" is that with traditional vaccines, a PRE-FORMED antigen, that remains extra-cellular, is introduced into the body, which induces antibody formation and immunity. The mRNA "vaccines" are neither pre-formed antigen or extra-cellular. The mRNA genetic code ENTERS cells, and causes the INTRACELLULAR PRODUCTION of the spike antigen. This induces an auto-immune response directed against those cells that are producing the spike antigen, as well as against the cells that those produced spike antigens attach to, after they are released. When those cells are lining the walls of blood vessels (endothelial cells), the immune response directed against them will cause clotting (thrombosis), oxygen starvation of the tissue supplied by those blood vessels (ischemia), the potential death of involved tissue, and the potential disability or death of the person. The spike protein can also spread and attach to adjacent cells within an organ and induce a tissue destroying auto-immune reaction.
Thus, there are two primary ways that a harmful and potentially lethal immune response to spike protein can occur: 1. an immune response directed against the spike protein of viruses that are replicating unchecked within endothelial cells or vital organ cells, and 2: an immune response directed against spike protein created by "vaccine" mRNA within endothelial and vital organ cells. The associate symptoms will be determined by which tissue the involved blood vessels supply or which organ happens to affected. Both forms of spike generated immune response are potentially disabling or lethal if the auto-immune response is unchecked.
Good morning, Tess! Thank you for this substack and your interview with this fascinating doctor. I just want you to know there seems to be a typo in your final point …
“That he and his colleague raised the alarm, submitting their findings to the UK Cabinet, yet with no appropriate much taken.”
My husband and I are in our 60s and not vaccinated. We’ve been well with robust health the entire pandemic. But in our small circle of friends, two men in their 60s and one in his early 70s, died of raging, aggressive cancers within 6-10 months of their two jab series in 2021. (Two lymphomas and one leukemia). I don’t think it’s just the boosters triggering these things. Even those with a completed two dose series are vulnerable. This was a wonderful talk, Tess. Thank you both.
Thanks for sharing this information, this was a very interesting interview. It seems the testing of new and repurposed drugs is something that needs to be solved. Testing completely outside of the normal regulated channels may be the way forward, as mentioned briefly. The cost will be much less and the costs can be privately funded, real philanthropists and individual regular donors. Lots of details to be sorted out but the corrupt trial process we now have is not working, actually it even worse than not working.
Many thanks for this amazing conversation! Prof Dalgleish mentioned that, apart from the Furin-cleavage site, 6 other sites had been added to the spike protein genome. For forensic purposes, it is really important to know what these sites are, and what pathology they may cause. I suspect that one of them is the code for the so-called super-antigen (known from other microorganisms) which causes fibrinogen to polymerize into Beta amyloid sheets, forming the indissoluble 'fibrinaloid' micro- and macro-clots that the embalmers are finding everywhere. Identifying this site as a insertion would be proof that the virus/vaccine operation was intended to kill and harm.
Hi, Tess. Due to a medical issue, I am unable currently to tolerate audio, so rely on closed captioning when viewing videos. I would love to be able to watch this interview, but, as is the case with so many videos, no cc'ing is provided. Is there any possibility you can activate it for this and any other videos you offer? I'm sure there are others who, for various reasons, are also reliant on cc'ing and it would be extremely appreciated.
Thank you! And thanks so much for your incredible work.
~23 min mark is great. There is no way that this data is being captured in the reporting databases. It's not temporal enough. Cancer doesn't work on that short of a timeline. You aren't gonna see it in a week or 2. And he makes a brilliant point about them being called the trouble makers When what they're trying to do is prevent trouble.
Fantastic interview Tess. Thank you so much. If I could just Make a constructive criticism, if you and your guests could work on suppressing the echo a little bit more, that would be great. Sometimes this can be done post production with someone who is good at sound editing. Otherwise the setting and the microphone can both play a role
Wouldn’t you think folks would listen to anyone who told them they think something might be extremely dangerous …or lethal? Now for more than past 2 yes we have scores if not 100’s or 1,000’s of Professors from top Universities and very experienced Drs and Scientists from all over the world, and credible others saying there are possible terrible dangers with these so called ‘vaccines’ …and folks don’t take it seriously?? So do folks believe their Media instead of leading experts Re warnings warning of serious harms and lethality? Warn everyone you even see I say!! It’s a duty!
Professor Dalgleish is a gem for sure. My daughter was recently diagnosed (it was initially missed) with metastatic breast cancer. Professor Dalgleish offered a Teams Meeting with her to discuss an off licence drug some of his patients were on when I enquired about it. Currently she is having integrated treatment in Germany with Dr Vogl at the Frankfurt University Hospital directed there by Cancer Options who also admire Professor Dalgleish's ability to think outside the box. Fortunately none of us have been vaccinated.
Musings: the AIDS fraud has been the model to repeat the fraud treatments with the Covid fraud and its killer solutions.
~29 min mark:To my knowledge nobody has examined data regarding increased infectivity/positive test results in the week or 2 weeks after the initial shot. Those people with just one shot were always considered to be unvaccinated. That data really should have been parsed out. It's possible that this virus never would have spread in the way that it did without the shot.
We know that the shot did not prevent transmission, but it is very possible that it played a key role in actually increasing the rate of spread.
One critical difference between all previous vaccines and the mRNA "vaccines" is that with traditional vaccines, a PRE-FORMED antigen, that remains extra-cellular, is introduced into the body, which induces antibody formation and immunity. The mRNA "vaccines" are neither pre-formed antigen or extra-cellular. The mRNA genetic code ENTERS cells, and causes the INTRACELLULAR PRODUCTION of the spike antigen. This induces an auto-immune response directed against those cells that are producing the spike antigen, as well as against the cells that those produced spike antigens attach to, after they are released. When those cells are lining the walls of blood vessels (endothelial cells), the immune response directed against them will cause clotting (thrombosis), oxygen starvation of the tissue supplied by those blood vessels (ischemia), the potential death of involved tissue, and the potential disability or death of the person. The spike protein can also spread and attach to adjacent cells within an organ and induce a tissue destroying auto-immune reaction.
Thus, there are two primary ways that a harmful and potentially lethal immune response to spike protein can occur: 1. an immune response directed against the spike protein of viruses that are replicating unchecked within endothelial cells or vital organ cells, and 2: an immune response directed against spike protein created by "vaccine" mRNA within endothelial and vital organ cells. The associate symptoms will be determined by which tissue the involved blood vessels supply or which organ happens to affected. Both forms of spike generated immune response are potentially disabling or lethal if the auto-immune response is unchecked.
Good morning, Tess! Thank you for this substack and your interview with this fascinating doctor. I just want you to know there seems to be a typo in your final point …
“That he and his colleague raised the alarm, submitting their findings to the UK Cabinet, yet with no appropriate much taken.”
My husband and I are in our 60s and not vaccinated. We’ve been well with robust health the entire pandemic. But in our small circle of friends, two men in their 60s and one in his early 70s, died of raging, aggressive cancers within 6-10 months of their two jab series in 2021. (Two lymphomas and one leukemia). I don’t think it’s just the boosters triggering these things. Even those with a completed two dose series are vulnerable. This was a wonderful talk, Tess. Thank you both.
Thanks for sharing this information, this was a very interesting interview. It seems the testing of new and repurposed drugs is something that needs to be solved. Testing completely outside of the normal regulated channels may be the way forward, as mentioned briefly. The cost will be much less and the costs can be privately funded, real philanthropists and individual regular donors. Lots of details to be sorted out but the corrupt trial process we now have is not working, actually it even worse than not working.
Many thanks for this amazing conversation! Prof Dalgleish mentioned that, apart from the Furin-cleavage site, 6 other sites had been added to the spike protein genome. For forensic purposes, it is really important to know what these sites are, and what pathology they may cause. I suspect that one of them is the code for the so-called super-antigen (known from other microorganisms) which causes fibrinogen to polymerize into Beta amyloid sheets, forming the indissoluble 'fibrinaloid' micro- and macro-clots that the embalmers are finding everywhere. Identifying this site as a insertion would be proof that the virus/vaccine operation was intended to kill and harm.
They are doubling down on fraud.
Hi, Tess. Due to a medical issue, I am unable currently to tolerate audio, so rely on closed captioning when viewing videos. I would love to be able to watch this interview, but, as is the case with so many videos, no cc'ing is provided. Is there any possibility you can activate it for this and any other videos you offer? I'm sure there are others who, for various reasons, are also reliant on cc'ing and it would be extremely appreciated.
Thank you! And thanks so much for your incredible work.
Tess, I'm curious to know why your title only questions whether the boosters are causing cancer, rather than the vaccines in general?
~23 min mark is great. There is no way that this data is being captured in the reporting databases. It's not temporal enough. Cancer doesn't work on that short of a timeline. You aren't gonna see it in a week or 2. And he makes a brilliant point about them being called the trouble makers When what they're trying to do is prevent trouble.
Enraging stuff.
A PhD RN in Britain has been pretty handcuffed on YT but still manages to use interesting language to thwart strong censorship on that platform.
He drank the koolaide, early, but has since followed the actual science, and now offers his viewers scientifically unquestionable conclusions.
https://youtu.be/j_DdSMn55cA
He won't be fooled again.
#NoAmnesty 💔
Fantastic interview Tess. Thank you so much. If I could just Make a constructive criticism, if you and your guests could work on suppressing the echo a little bit more, that would be great. Sometimes this can be done post production with someone who is good at sound editing. Otherwise the setting and the microphone can both play a role
Wouldn’t you think folks would listen to anyone who told them they think something might be extremely dangerous …or lethal? Now for more than past 2 yes we have scores if not 100’s or 1,000’s of Professors from top Universities and very experienced Drs and Scientists from all over the world, and credible others saying there are possible terrible dangers with these so called ‘vaccines’ …and folks don’t take it seriously?? So do folks believe their Media instead of leading experts Re warnings warning of serious harms and lethality? Warn everyone you even see I say!! It’s a duty!
Terrifying that any cures that don't involve evil MegaPharmas poisons are vigorously & rabidly suppressed. Often by the actual govtards law(s).