This week, I learned that the Irish government cannot enter into a pandemic treaty with the W.H.O. without a referendum, due to the Crotty ruling precedent.
Great presentation - now let us hope that the Irish people are awake enough to vote a resounding NO! to this power grab / medical coup. However, never underestimate the stupidity and influence of the current Irish (and British, and French, and German.... you get the idea) political class, who simply take instructions from their even stupider EU handlers, who in turn get their talking points from the Oligarchs in charge. I have always said that Ireland stopped being a Republic when it joined the European Community (now the EU) - it is simply a little European lap dog. And I am Irish for heavens sake!!!
Regarding the safety of Covid-19 vaccines I'd like to share a segment from Jeff Childers post today about the terms safe and effective. Link to the original post follows.
"Of course you remember the phrase “safe and effective.” How could you forget? That phrase fueled every single vaccine mandate. Well … it was always a lie, even before they found out the shots didn’t work, right from the start, and the [FLORIDA] Grand Jury Report explained exactly how they did it.
"This is critically-important: the federal agencies like the CDC and the FDA played a rhetorical shell game on America. And the corporate media helped them hide the definitional pea. First of all, when government officials called the vaccines “safe,” they were using a legal term of art.
"In other words, when they said safe, they deceptively relied on a highly-subjective legal definition that doesn’t actually mean “safe” — but never said so.
"Here’s how the Grand Jury Report explained it:
'" The legal definition of the word "safety" with respect to biological products can be found in the code of Federal Regulations: The word safety means the relative freedom from harmful effect to persons affected, directly, or indirectly, by a product when prudently administered, taking into consideration the character of the product in relation to the condition of the recipient t the time."'
"In other words, the vaccines were never considered “safe” in general. When Fauci said the jabs were safe, he meant they were “safe” compared to the relative risk posed by the virus (“relative freedom from harmful effect” and “the condition of the recipient”). All the CDC and FDA had to do was decide the virus was more deadly than the bubonic plague — which they did — and then virtually anything could be considered safe, no matter how risky it really was.
"Even worse than helping the agencies mislead people with a legalistic definition of an everyday dictionary word, the media never even asked the agencies to explain the risk/reward matrix. So they got away with using a totally-subjective standard that wasn’t tied to anything — certainly not to anything scientific.
"The media could have explained all this to us at the time, but they didn’t. They are pathetically useless and I hope every reporter who helped promote this lie gets fired.
"So they can spend time in honest self-reflection, of course.
"The term “effective” is nearly as bad. When the government said the vaccines were “effective,” they used a weasel definition for that word too. Legally speaking, the term “effectiveness” can be based on a regulatory determination arising from clinical trials, as you would expect, or from “other data.”
‘Other data’ is undefined.
"There weren’t any clinical trials proving effictiveness [sic]— Pfizer never even tested for that. The regulators relied on “other data” to conclude the shots were effective. The media never asked the agencies to explain what their “other data” was that caused them to determine the vaccines were so “effective.” From the report, citing federal statute:
'"The term efficacy refers to the finding in an adequate and well-controlled clinical trial or the intent of conducting such a trial and the term effectiveness refers to the regulatory determination that is made on the basis of clinical efficacy and other days."'
"It was all wordplay, right from day one. They tricked us by secretly using a different definition for common dictionary words, a stealthy different definition than what we thought they meant. They will blame us for not knowing the legal meanings of those words and stupidly assuming they were using lay definitions. But they are experts, you see, so how can you expect them to speak plainly?
"They got away with it last time. But now we know. They won’t get away with it any more. The term “safe and effective” has become a hissing and a byword."
Thank you ,Tess, for sharing this important information. Shame on any countries that still refuse to see the damage done by this “vaccine” and the WHO.
Tess, you are doing an absolutely excellent job of sharing your brilliant, honest and insightful knowledge, and comprehension of how important it is for personal human choice… not ideas about health pressed upon us from an unelected body, with a rather dodgy track record, and seemingly zero real concern for the true well being of humanity at large. Thank you from the centre of all true hearts who appreciate your work more than good words can say. THANK YOU.
well done tess keep on keeping on......people of the uk be aware theres a petition on the uk parliament petition page...end the uks membership of the world health organisation it currently has over 94000 signatures it needs a minimum of 100000 signatures to get it debated in the uk parliament...and that is where i need each one you that will read this post to step up to the plate...firstly by signing it and even if you already have..in both cases be sure to reshare it widely all over the uk with as many like minded people and groups as you possibly can and be sure to ask each one of them to also sign it and to also reshare it widely in exactly the same way...there are many social media platforms and alternative outlets that can be used to do this that said beware gestapo book who have been and continue to both shadow ban and suppress it..in closing for much more information about the who and the pandemic treaty be sure to check out both the james roguski substack and the steve kirsch substack
Great speech, Tess! Thanks so much. Looking forward to the video. I was surprised , though, that you did not list the distinct potential for "disregard of/for human rights" in the IHR amendment bullet points.
You asked : "could it ever be acceptable to transfer decision-making powers reserved for democratic institutions to an unelected, unaccountable body not subject to constitutional or control mechanisms?"
Not in any sane world! Let's hope enough of our world is still SANE!
I’ll be rude here and add in a second comment with a link to a video by Tracey O’Mahoney which was where Eddie got his information about the loophole in our law. All credit to both of them for highlighting this and may it stand us in good stead.
Thanks for keeping us informed on this. I'm wondering how the Irish citizenry is doing. I often feel like everyone here in Canada is still pretending nothing is going on.
Well done Tess for all this info. What a blessing it is to have people like you!
Great presentation - now let us hope that the Irish people are awake enough to vote a resounding NO! to this power grab / medical coup. However, never underestimate the stupidity and influence of the current Irish (and British, and French, and German.... you get the idea) political class, who simply take instructions from their even stupider EU handlers, who in turn get their talking points from the Oligarchs in charge. I have always said that Ireland stopped being a Republic when it joined the European Community (now the EU) - it is simply a little European lap dog. And I am Irish for heavens sake!!!
Regarding the safety of Covid-19 vaccines I'd like to share a segment from Jeff Childers post today about the terms safe and effective. Link to the original post follows.
"Of course you remember the phrase “safe and effective.” How could you forget? That phrase fueled every single vaccine mandate. Well … it was always a lie, even before they found out the shots didn’t work, right from the start, and the [FLORIDA] Grand Jury Report explained exactly how they did it.
"This is critically-important: the federal agencies like the CDC and the FDA played a rhetorical shell game on America. And the corporate media helped them hide the definitional pea. First of all, when government officials called the vaccines “safe,” they were using a legal term of art.
"In other words, when they said safe, they deceptively relied on a highly-subjective legal definition that doesn’t actually mean “safe” — but never said so.
"Here’s how the Grand Jury Report explained it:
'" The legal definition of the word "safety" with respect to biological products can be found in the code of Federal Regulations: The word safety means the relative freedom from harmful effect to persons affected, directly, or indirectly, by a product when prudently administered, taking into consideration the character of the product in relation to the condition of the recipient t the time."'
"In other words, the vaccines were never considered “safe” in general. When Fauci said the jabs were safe, he meant they were “safe” compared to the relative risk posed by the virus (“relative freedom from harmful effect” and “the condition of the recipient”). All the CDC and FDA had to do was decide the virus was more deadly than the bubonic plague — which they did — and then virtually anything could be considered safe, no matter how risky it really was.
"Even worse than helping the agencies mislead people with a legalistic definition of an everyday dictionary word, the media never even asked the agencies to explain the risk/reward matrix. So they got away with using a totally-subjective standard that wasn’t tied to anything — certainly not to anything scientific.
"The media could have explained all this to us at the time, but they didn’t. They are pathetically useless and I hope every reporter who helped promote this lie gets fired.
"So they can spend time in honest self-reflection, of course.
"The term “effective” is nearly as bad. When the government said the vaccines were “effective,” they used a weasel definition for that word too. Legally speaking, the term “effectiveness” can be based on a regulatory determination arising from clinical trials, as you would expect, or from “other data.”
‘Other data’ is undefined.
"There weren’t any clinical trials proving effictiveness [sic]— Pfizer never even tested for that. The regulators relied on “other data” to conclude the shots were effective. The media never asked the agencies to explain what their “other data” was that caused them to determine the vaccines were so “effective.” From the report, citing federal statute:
'"The term efficacy refers to the finding in an adequate and well-controlled clinical trial or the intent of conducting such a trial and the term effectiveness refers to the regulatory determination that is made on the basis of clinical efficacy and other days."'
"It was all wordplay, right from day one. They tricked us by secretly using a different definition for common dictionary words, a stealthy different definition than what we thought they meant. They will blame us for not knowing the legal meanings of those words and stupidly assuming they were using lay definitions. But they are experts, you see, so how can you expect them to speak plainly?
"They got away with it last time. But now we know. They won’t get away with it any more. The term “safe and effective” has become a hissing and a byword."
https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/weekend-at-zelenskys-wednesday-february
Thank you ,Tess, for sharing this important information. Shame on any countries that still refuse to see the damage done by this “vaccine” and the WHO.
God bless you and keep you safe Tess! We need your calm, sincere and brave intelligence to continue shining a light for truth!
Tess, you are doing an absolutely excellent job of sharing your brilliant, honest and insightful knowledge, and comprehension of how important it is for personal human choice… not ideas about health pressed upon us from an unelected body, with a rather dodgy track record, and seemingly zero real concern for the true well being of humanity at large. Thank you from the centre of all true hearts who appreciate your work more than good words can say. THANK YOU.
well done tess keep on keeping on......people of the uk be aware theres a petition on the uk parliament petition page...end the uks membership of the world health organisation it currently has over 94000 signatures it needs a minimum of 100000 signatures to get it debated in the uk parliament...and that is where i need each one you that will read this post to step up to the plate...firstly by signing it and even if you already have..in both cases be sure to reshare it widely all over the uk with as many like minded people and groups as you possibly can and be sure to ask each one of them to also sign it and to also reshare it widely in exactly the same way...there are many social media platforms and alternative outlets that can be used to do this that said beware gestapo book who have been and continue to both shadow ban and suppress it..in closing for much more information about the who and the pandemic treaty be sure to check out both the james roguski substack and the steve kirsch substack
They screwed up by running con-vid fake-demic before the WHO treaty and amendments were buttoned up.
Now many are skeptical of big pharma as we see with the dismal single digit booster uptake.
I think the globalists became dumber while we became smarter.
https://robc137.substack.com/p/looking-behind-the-curtain-of-oz
Great speech, Tess! Thanks so much. Looking forward to the video. I was surprised , though, that you did not list the distinct potential for "disregard of/for human rights" in the IHR amendment bullet points.
You asked : "could it ever be acceptable to transfer decision-making powers reserved for democratic institutions to an unelected, unaccountable body not subject to constitutional or control mechanisms?"
Not in any sane world! Let's hope enough of our world is still SANE!
I’ll be rude here and add in a second comment with a link to a video by Tracey O’Mahoney which was where Eddie got his information about the loophole in our law. All credit to both of them for highlighting this and may it stand us in good stead.
https://youtu.be/R-ZTc5bdx8Y
Thanks for keeping us informed on this. I'm wondering how the Irish citizenry is doing. I often feel like everyone here in Canada is still pretending nothing is going on.
Way to go, Tess! Thank you greatly for doing this important work.
Very well done presentation.
Thank you Dr Tess for bring this to our attention.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/79
2 days ago the United States Congress Health Committee gave their full measure against any support of the W.H.O.
https://www.youtube.com/live/ERnFjULhz54?feature=shared