My Letter to Dr Andrew Hill Video
To address the many requests I get about where to locate this video, I'm posting it here for ease of sharing
About this documentary video
In October 2020, Dr. Andrew Hill was tasked to report to the World Health Organization on the dozens of new studies from around the world suggesting that Ivermectin could be a remarkably safe and effective treatment for COVID-19.
But on January 18th 2021, Dr. Hill published his findings on a pre-print server. His methods lacked rigour, the review was low quality and the extremely positive findings on ivermectin were contradicted by the conclusion of the paper. In the end, Dr. Hill advised that “Ivermectin should be validated in larger appropriately controlled randomized trials before the results are sufficient for review by regulatory authorities.”
Watch this 18-minute video to see what the consequences have meant for the world.
Why this video is important.
A Letter to Dr. Andrew Hill offers insight into how the science on effective, low-cost and safe Covid treatments was corrupted. It is an introduction to an alternative “safe and effective” narrative. It is an invitation to open the Covid Pandora’s Box, for which Ivermectin is the key.
What happened to the review on Ivermectin?
With a highly qualified team comprising three expert Cochrane systematic reviewers, a senior statistician, a health economist, two specialist clinicians and a patient representative (a retired physicist, PhD), we published our robust review entitled “Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Guidelines” in June 2021, without Dr Andrew Hill, who clearly had serious conflicts of interest, and without the support of Cochrane (which is another story).
The systematic review is currently ranked #8th out of more than 24 million tracked scientific articles and #1 out of all articles in the American Journal of Therapeutics.
However, it has never been referenced by any health authorities or regulatory agencies, to my knowledge, despite it being sent to the WHO, MHRA, FDA, NIH, SAPRHA, TGA and more, along with the British Ivermectin Recommendation Development (BiRD) recommendations on ivermectin for Covid-19 in early 2021.
Where to from here?
We were recently invited by the AJT Editor to update the review. However, as highlighted in Alexander Merinos recent article, the corruption of subsequent trials that were designed to show that ivermectin doesn’t work makes such a task futile until we have full disclosure and transparency from the TOGETHER and other trial investigators – something that I doubt will be forthcoming without a warrant. In any event, we know ivermectin works and is safe – further analysis is not necessary and we simply do not need to prove this anymore.
In fact, we probably never did! With a safe, older, inexpensive, widely-used, over the counter medicine, there was never anything to lose by giving it a try in a health emergency. Common sense was all that was needed and word of mouth about it’s effectiveness for Covid-19 based on the experiences of doctors and patients should have sufficed. Sadly, common sense was a barrier to the billion dollar Covid industry and was strongly discouraged.
For those wishing to find out more about the 99+ ivermectin studies, which ones can be relied upon and which cannot, I refer you to www.ivmmeta.com. Every ivermectin study can be found at this web address, meticulously analysed and presented with care.
Whilst I have moved on from ivermectin data analysis feeling that my energy is best invested in creating accountable health systems through the World Council for Health initiative, so that what happened during Covid never happens again, I shall remain eternally grateful to the dedicated scientists behind this rigorous ivermectin collaboration. Thanks guys, hopefully one day we will meet in person!
Many thanks also to Alexandros Merinos, Eva Tallaksen, and Phil Harper, for their tenacious investigative journalism exposing the corruption of science on ivermectin and those behind it.
Interested in Recent History?
If you want to know more about the ivermectin journey, you may be interested in visiting the BiRD Group website, which is in fact the seed of the World Council for Health. Of particular interest is the video archive of the International Ivermectin for Covid-19 Conference held in June 2021, which was moderated by Dr. Mobeen Syed.
Speakers included Dr. Pierre Kory (USA), Prof. Hector Carvallo (Argentina), Mr Juan Jose Chamie Quintero (USA), Mr Andrew Bryant (UK), Dr. David Chesler (USA), Prof. Eli Schwartz (Israel), Dr. Wasif Khan (Bangladesh), Dr. Manjul Medhi (UK), Prof. Matjaž Zwitter (Slovenia), Dr. Tina Peers (UK) and me.
And, as always, thank you for your support!
If you enjoy my Substack articles, please consider becoming a paid subscriber. All proceeds go to the work of the World Council for Health. Thank you!
As I wrote in the text accompanying your historic reading of “Mistakes Were NOT Made,” Tess:
“As if witnessing Tess’s heart-piercing reading of my poem wasn’t thrilling enough, the director and cinematographer—Mark Lawrie—also happens to be responsible for creating my number-one red-pilling video, A Letter to Dr Andrew Hill. I have referenced it more than any other video across my posts, and I consider it the most important eighteen minutes and fifty-three seconds you can spend to understand the scientific fraud underpinning COVID tyranny.” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/mistakes-were-not-made-an-anthem-57a)
I also featured “A Letter to Dr Andrew Hill” in my letter to Alex Berenson in July 2022:
• “Letter to Alex Berenson on World Ivermectin Day” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/letter-to-alex-berenson-on-world)
Now I consider it my #2 red-pilling video—after your reading of my poem :-) So you and Mark are responsible for two of the most significant videos of the COVID era, and collaborating with both of you has been one of the highlights of my life.
Just over two years ago, I published my case study of the ivermectin disinformation campaign:
• “Letter to a Scientifically-Minded Friend” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/letter-to-a-scientifically-minded)
It is amazing to think I didn’t know you, Pierre, or Paul Marik at the time of that writing but no doubt encountered your names while scouring PubMed for research on ivermectin. It wasn’t until I read the transcript of your exchange with Andrew Hill in “The Real Anthony Fauci” that I “met” you—and it was your heroic exchange with Andrew that inspired me to launch my Profiles in Courage series:
• “Profiles in Courage: Dr. Tess Lawrie” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/profiles-in-courage-dr-tess-lawrie)
I remember watching your open letter to Andrew Hill and being very moved by it. This was my introduction to you - and to Andrew Hill. I was moved by your caring, recoiled from him.