Discussion about this post

User's avatar
The Wiltster's avatar

This. "The study confirms that the most basic arguments in favour of the assumed protective role of COVID-19 vaccination are seriously flawed."

I am far, far, from an immunologist or an epidemiologist, but it ALWAYS struck me as flawed to assume that increased antibodies, in response to a specific version of a rapidly mutating virus, would offer generalized protection. I placed such assertions in the same bucket as "hybrid immunity" which was, somewhat shockingly, embraced by a number of technical people who I thought would have known better. In fact, for almost the entire Great Covid Debacle puffery has masqueraded as scientific assertion.

Expand full comment
23 more comments...

No posts