Breaking: Published science proves that the Covid-19 “vaccine" increases mortality
Surviving COVID-19 has been falsely attributed to the Covid-19 injections
A 2024 study by Adhikari et al. titled "Brief research report: impact of vaccination on antibody responses and mortality from severe COVID-19" examined the impact of COVID-19 vaccination on antibody responses and mortality rates among people hospitalized with severe COVID-19.
The study investigated whether vaccination status was linked to the risk of dying from COVID-19 in hospital. Most studies that claim a positive effect of the COVID-19 ‘vaccine’, which is in essence a GMO gene product, have simply focussed on the level of antibodies produced so say that it ‘works’ against COVID-19. This paper looked at actual mortality (death) rates among vaccinated patients compared with non-vaccinated patients.
The study found that the risk of death from COVID-19 was almost double in vaccinated (Vax) patients compared with non-vaccinated (NVax) patients even after adjusting for co-morbidities (e.g. heart disease) and age, which may increase the risk of death among those vaccinated.
Surviving COVID-19 has been falsely attributed to the Covid-19 injections
The study confirms that the most basic arguments in favour of the assumed protective role of COVID-19 vaccination are seriously flawed.
The observations, questions, and hypotheses raised in the study could have far-reaching consequences, as they challenge the assumption that COVID-19 vaccination offers a protective role in terms of survival.
In conclusion, the article by Adhikari et al. raises questions about the relationship between COVID-19 vaccination, antibody responses, and mortality rates among people hospitalised with COVID-19. These findings now need to serve as a model for further research to confirm the outcome.
Recommended Reading
References
Adhikari, Bindu, et al. "Brief research report: impact of vaccination on antibody responses and mortality from severe COVID-19." Frontiers in immunology 15 (2024): 1325243.
Siguna Mueller. Comment on Adhikari et al. Their findings invalidate the postulated mechanism and effects of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines and their predominant efficacy measures. https://osf.io/t2k6f
Thank you for your support!
If you find value in this work, please consider becoming a paid subscriber of this Substack or the World Council for Health Substack, if you have not yet done so. All proceeds go towards the humanitarian work of the World Council for Health.
This. "The study confirms that the most basic arguments in favour of the assumed protective role of COVID-19 vaccination are seriously flawed."
I am far, far, from an immunologist or an epidemiologist, but it ALWAYS struck me as flawed to assume that increased antibodies, in response to a specific version of a rapidly mutating virus, would offer generalized protection. I placed such assertions in the same bucket as "hybrid immunity" which was, somewhat shockingly, embraced by a number of technical people who I thought would have known better. In fact, for almost the entire Great Covid Debacle puffery has masqueraded as scientific assertion.
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/immunology/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1325243/full